Answer:
The loss of the financial institution is $413,000
Explanation:
Let's say that after 3 years the financial institution will receive:
0.5 * 10% of $10million
= 0.5 * 0.1 * 10000000
= $500,000
Then, they will pay 0.5 * 9% of $10M
= 0.5 * 0.09 * 10000000
= $450,000
Therefore, their immediate loss would be $500000 - $450000
= $50000.
Let's assume that forward rates are realized to value the rest of the swap.
The forward rates = 8% per annum.
Therefore, the remaining cash flows are assumed that floating payment is
0.5*0.08*10000000 =
$400,000
Received net payment would be:
500,000-400,000= $100,000. The total cost of default is therefore the cost of foregoing the following cash flows:
Year 3=$50,000
Year 3.5=$100,000
Year 4 = $100,000
Year 4.5= $100,000
Year 5 = $100,000
Discounting these cash flows to year 3 at 4% per six months, the cost of default would be $413,000
Because sometimes the check written after the statement closing dates.
Lets say a company do a closing statement on December 26.
A check written between that date until the end of period ( December 26 - December 31), that transaction simply won't appear on the book because the company already closed the statement on December 26
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "a. the sale or transfer of the franchise to a government entity." One of the most important features of the franchise contract is the provision related to <span>a. the sale or transfer of the franchise to a government entity.</span>
Answer:
brand loyalty
Explanation:
Brand loyalty: The term "brand loyalty" is determined as the propensity of specific consumers to "continuously purchase" a particular brand's products over some other brand's products. However, a specific consumer's behavioral patterns are responsible for demonstrating that he or she will continue to purchase products from the same company that has been fostered a "trusting relationship".
In the question above, the given statement represents brand loyalty.
Answer:
At 1.783 or more, the conversion yield better gain than sales the corn
Explanation:
The ethanol conversion become attractive if the cost for doing the conversion are lower than the sale revenue for the product.
<u>total cost: raw materials + conversion cost</u>
corn price: $ 3.75
conversion cost: $ 1.60
Total cost: $ 5.35
<u>output: gallon of ethanol per bushel</u>
3 gallons of ethanol per bushel
total cost / output = 5.35/3 = 1.783 cost per gallon