All categories

2 years ago

Arded

1 answer:

6 0

The total amount of the costs listed above that are NOT direct costs of the Brentwood Stores equals to $157,000.

<h3>What are direct cost?</h3>

This refers to the price that can be directly tied to the production of specific goods or services.

The non- direct costs of the Brentwood Store includes:

Corporate legal office salaries
Corporate headquarters building lease
Central warehouse lease cost

Hence, the Costs that are not direct costs of the Brentwood Store = Corporate legal office salaries + Corporate headquarters building lease + Central warehouse lease cost

= $68,000 + $86,000 + $3,000

= $157,000

Therefore, the total amount of the costs listed above that are NOT direct costs of the Brentwood Stores equals to $157,000.

You might be interested in

Question 5 of 10

Basile [38]

Answer:

sorry:(

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Lance owns Lance Lawns Irrigation Systems, LLC, a company that installs and maintains underground lawn irrigation systems. Busin

erma4kov [3.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is option C.

Explanation:

There is a recession in the economy. It has lead to a reduction in the construction of new houses. This has affected Lance's business adversely. Also, the banks are going to increase the interest rates for the credit or reduce the credit limit.

An expansion in the economy will be helpful for Lance's business. If feds reduce interest rates, the cost of borrowing will decrease. This will boost investment in the economy. With the increase in investment production and income increase as well. This will create more demand in the economy.

5 0

3 years ago

A firm produces and sells two products, Plus and Max. The following information is available relating to setup costs (a part of

SVEN [57.7K]

Answer:

$5.4 and $5.4

Explanation:

The formula and the computation is shown below:

= Total setup cost ÷ total direct labor hours

= $91,800 ÷ 102,000 hours

= $0.9

For plus:

Setup cost is

= $0.9 × 6

= $5.4

And,

For Max:

= $0.9 × 6

= $5.4

We simply multiplied the per unit with the direct labor per unit so that the allocation to each unit could come

8 0

3 years ago

Suppose labor productivity differences are the only determinants of comparative advantage, and Brazil and Chile both produce onl

o-na [289]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "A": Brazil only.

Explanation:

Comparative advantage is the ability of an organization or individual to produce at lower opportunity costs. This is achieved by introducing efficient productivity strategies or achieving economies of scale.

For the case given, the comparative advantage of Brazil and Chile is based on labor productivity only. Then:

<em>The comparative advantage of Chile on sugar</em> = $\frac{2 units of sugar}{5 units of coffee}$ = 0.4
<em>The comparative advantage of Brazil on sugar </em>= $\frac{1 unit of sugar}{2 units of coffee}$ = 0.5

Thus, <em>Brazil has a comparative advantage over Chile on sugar.</em>

4 0

3 years ago

A negatively skewed distribution would most likely violate which assumption?

Inessa [10]

It would most likely violate assumption of normality
Under assumption of normality, we will assume that all variables that relevant to our observation are distributed normally.
Skewed distribution happens when there is an imbalance/anomaly in the distribution, so it will violate the assumption.

4 0

3 years ago