1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimulka [17.4K]
3 years ago
14

HELP ME WITH THIS ASAP PLEASE!!! IM VERY CONFUSED...

History
1 answer:
PtichkaEL [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

For the original scenario, it’s up to you and what you think would be most valuable to trade for. For Scenario One, most valuable trade items could include food-based instead of material-based items. For Scenario Two, most valuable trade items could include wool and leather.

Explanation:

For the original scenario, it’s all up to what you think would be best for you. For Scenario One, it states that food spoils easily, so it would make sense that trading for food would be more important as you can’t take any with you without it spoiling. For Scenario Two, it states that warm clothing would be important, so wool and leather could go towards making clothing to stay warm.

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
What was the result of the absence of food in world war 2​
scoray [572]

Malnutrition is the answer please choose brainliest

5 0
3 years ago
2. Passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act resulted most directly in
Art [367]

Answer:b

Explanation:because i have done this question

4 0
3 years ago
Can someone give me 5 supporting details on why can’t the president leave the White House alone and governmental political group
slamgirl [31]

Answer: for his own protection.

Explanation: He can only leave with his Secret Service men. Besides if he wanted a pizza or beer or something all he had to do was make a phone call down to the kitchen and it’s done

3 0
3 years ago
Qhy does one party rule matter to totalitarian states
12345 [234]

The totalitarian states usually don't allow any opposition parties to exist. If some people try to form a party, they usually end up in prison, are banished from the nation, or even murdered.

The reason why the totalitarian rulers prefer a one party system is in order to have all the power in the country, without having opposition that will constantly go public about the terrors and injustices that are happening. If there are more parties, than the people will start to support them, especially cause rarely who likes to live under a totalitarian ruler, thus the totalitarian ruler will face a situation where he/she will lose its power.

3 0
3 years ago
How did connecting western farms with eastern cities affect shipping goods to market?
Rasek [7]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

it increased because of the population.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did ruby bridges change history
    9·1 answer
  • How did the presidential election of 1860 help lead to the civil war?
    7·1 answer
  • Which modern musical instrument is descended from the aulos, The organ, harp, guitar or the oboe.
    11·2 answers
  • Classify the given ideas based on weather they are supported or opposed by islamic fundamentalist
    7·1 answer
  • Think again about the prompt you were given. Here’s a thesis that would respond to the prompt “Henry Ford built on the concept o
    10·1 answer
  • Isaac Newton's contributions to science are sometimes referred to as the "Newtonian Revolution" because he
    8·1 answer
  • A radio or television program or transmission is called a(n):
    5·1 answer
  • Muchrackers contributed to the rise of Progressivism in the early years of the 20th century by
    5·1 answer
  • How many generations did it take for pioneers like Lincoln's family to settle the west?
    13·1 answer
  • India was granted its independence from Great Britain ...
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!