Answer:
In some instances ,BPM will lead to a paradigm shift that transforms the nature of the business itself.it is false.
Explanation: BPM means business process management. Paradigm shift means a drastic change.A massive change in standards ,thinking patterns and values.
BPM brings changes in business .It is an approach to execute and control various processes to achieve the results according to the goals of the organisation.BPM do bring changes in business but it does not lead to a paradigm shift that transforms the nature of business.
Answer:
c. 9.90%
Explanation:
The formula to compute the expected rate of return is shown below:
Expected rate of return = (Probability 1 × Possible Returns 1) + (Probability 2 × Possible Returns 2) + (Probability 3 × Possible Returns 3)
= (0.50 × 25%) + (0.30 × 10%) + (0.20 × - 28%)
= 12.5% + 3% - 5.6%
= 9.90%
Simply we multiplied the probabilities with its return so that the expected rate of return can come.
<span>c. actual usage of material exceeds the standard material allowed for output.</span>
Answer:
D) configure their products and services in ways that have built-in growth potential
Explanation:
Savvy growth-minded company tend to design their product in a way that can be easily adjusted following the future's demand. By doing this, the company's could grow their sales using the same product even if the situation in the market change in the future.
In the case above, the companies sold sandals with interchangeable straps. This means that the product that is made by the company could easily adjusted to follow the trend that exist among their consumer groups in the future.
For example if in the future there is a certain design/theme that is favored by their customers, the company could just change the straps to follow the trend rather than creating a whole new batch of sandals.
Answer: a. It merely conducted some activity outside of Alaska and that activity took place through a website.
Explanation:
CalmDown can use the defence that all it did was to conduct an activity through it's website and this happened to be outside Alaska.
As such the company is still bound by the state that it is registered in which in this case would seem to be in Alaska. They are not to be bound by the laws of another jurisdiction from the one they are registered to if the activity was done on the internet.
Marcus should therefore try to bring action against them in Alaska if he can.