This question is incomplete. Here is the complete question:
Read this thesis statement: "<em>Heart of Darkness</em> plunges the narrator into the depths of the Congo." What is wrong with it?:
A) It is too narrow.
B) It is a plot summary.
C) It is too obvious.
D) It is not supported by the text.
Answer:
The correct answer is option A) It is too narrow.
Explanation:
As we know, this story is narrated by the protagonist, Charlie Marlow, who tells us of the journey he made going up a tropical river to locate a certain Kurtz, an elusive and legendary explorer who, according to his superiors, seems to have entrenched himself deep inside from the jungle. Soon the journey turns into a multi-troubled journey, with mystery and degradation growing as the legend of Lord Kurtz enlarges and takes shape.
The novel is based on a true story in the life of Conrad, who sailed up the Congo River as a ship captain in 1890 while working for the SGB company. There, amid the exploitation and genocide that the settlers carried out in the Congo Free State - the private preserve of King Leopold II of Belgium - Conrad was truly traumatized, wanting to relate the horror of his experience in a book in which, on the other hand, and despite the parallels between author and protagonist, no real places or characters are mentioned.
Just using the phrase<em> "plunges the narrator into the depths of the Congo"</em> is too vague to describe the actual plot. Therefore, answer A is correct.
Orange green green orange orange green yellow green orange orange green green orange yellow orange orange yellow orange green yellow orange yellow green green orange orange yellow yellow green orange orange green
<h3>
Answer: <u>
Majority rule is the most important part of the representative democracy.</u></h3>
Explanation: Majority rule is the most important part of the representative democracy. People vote for candidates to represent them in the decision-making process in representative democracy.
Answer:
This means that it doesn't matter how old you are and if you have lived longer than someone else. It is simply how much and what experiences you have had and what you got out of it. Even if you are younger then someone else, you could still have had more experiences and interactions that make your experiences richer. A successful 30 year old that has lived life to the fullest and met a lot of people and enjoyed many different things would have richer experiences than an 80 year old who lived their entire lives alone and in their rooms.
- I wrote this btw
