Answer:
72 inches because a hexagon has 6 sides so you multiply 6 × 12 
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
2520°
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum of the angles in any triangle is 180°
shape. sides. triangles. sum int angles.
triangle. 180×1=180°
quad. 180×2=360°
pentagon. 180×3=540°
n-sides. n( n−2) 180(n−2)
16-sides. 180×14=2520°
 
        
             
        
        
        
Step-by-step explanation:
y-y₁=m(x-x₁) 
1-(-4)=m(4-3)
5=m
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
123
Step-by-step explanation:
In a parallelogram, both pairs of opposite angles are congruent. Also, both pairs of opposite sides are parallel, meaning there are consecutive interior angles. Consecutive interior angles equal 180, so simply subtract 57 from 180 to find your missing angles.
 
        
             
        
        
        
A statement which best describes the strength of the correlation, and the causation between the variables is that: D. it is a strong positive correlation, and it is likely causal.
<h3>What is a positive correlation?</h3>
A positive correlation can be defined as a terminology that is used to described a scenario (situation) in which two variables move in the same direction and are in tandem.
This ultimately implies that, a positive correlation exist when two variables have a linear relationship or are in direct proportion. Hence, when one variable increases, the other increases as well, and vice-versa.
By critically observing the scatter plot (see attachment) which models the data in the given table, we can infer and logically deduce that the value on the y-axis (circumference) increases as the value on the x-axis (radius) increases, so this is a strong positive correlation.
Also, we know that there exist a direct relationship between the circumference of a circle and its radius, so this relationship is most likely causal.
In conclusion, a statement which best describes the strength of the correlation, and the causation between the variables is that it's a strong positive correlation, and it is likely causal.
Read more on positive correlation here: brainly.com/question/10644261
#SPJ1