I would assume it's being obedient to their husbands.
The last one invest in heavily in machines and factories as well as new business...(of topic but do you go to rhs)
Answer:
Answered below
Explanation:
If I were president I would make policies that minimize access to guns and ammunitions by most people. Following the recent incidents of school shootings, workplace shootings, church shootings, community violence and gun fights, it is clearly necessary to implement stricter gun control measures.
I would raise the age of eligibility to legally possess a weapon to 28 years old. Any person wanting to purchase a gun would be made to go through thorough questioning to access their psychological state. Background checks to ascertain the criminal history of potential buyers would be compulsory. Automatic and high calibre weapons would be banned. Open carry would be made illegal. I would make sure the number of weapons owned by one person is reduced to two.
With these steps we would see gun violence and shootings decline significantly. Killing of innocent children in schools, party goers, co-workers etc, by aggrieved people would be events of the past.
Answer:
Some, unable to pay their mortgages, lost their plantations when
the banks foreclosed. Some sold out to Northern carpetbaggers.
Those who were able to keep their land realized that they could not
sustain cotton production on an industrial scale without the slave
labor force, because they could not afford to pay living wages.
They developed a system called sharecropping by which the field hands would receive a portion of the crop in exchange for their
labor. The sharecroppers lived on the plantation in their own
shacks. In practice, the system was little better than slavery. the sharecropper had to pay their rent out of their share of the crop,
with very littl left over for anything beyond subsistence.
Answer:
Hope this helps. :)
Explanation:
In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories.
