I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
Mr. Chrunabai Jekabhai Amin
Explanation:
Eastern Europe has the highest Muslim population. Im not sure if it would be the same considering your choices are southeastern europe
Answer:
<h3>C) is a term that is synonymous with rotation in office.</h3>
Explanation:
- The Spoils system was a system that gave victorious parties the right to distributed administrative offices to its own party members and supporters.
- Similar to the change in the elective members of the government, the spoils system was also based on the concept of 'rotation in office'. According to spoils system, the administrative offices and positions can be filled by the members of victorious party.
- The failure to separate administration from politics gave provisions to spoils system.
