Answer:
84.35%
Explanation:
The computation of Margaret’s wage replacement ratio using the top-down approach is shown below:
= 100 - Social Security payroll tax rate - saving rate
= 100 - 7.65% - 8%
= 84.35%
For determining Margaret’s wage replacement ratio, we subtract the Social Security payroll tax rate and the saving rate from the percentage value i.e 100 so that the accurate ratio can come.
Answer:
A. risen; risen
Explanation:
This is true because you are able to purchase more with the same amount of money
Answer:
D. The constant growth model cannot be used for a zero growth stock, where the dividend is expected to remain constant over time.
Explanation:
So, we evaluate each option.
a. We discount the dividends by the required rate of return. So incorrect.
b. The dividend yield is annual dividend per share divided by stick price per share. the 5% is the growth in dividend and not the actual dividend itself. So, incorrect.
c. The constant growth is appropriate for companies whose dividend patterns are stable. Startups have multiple stage growths and this option becomes incorrect as constant growth is not applicable.
d. A zero growth stock is one where dividend remains the same. So when there is no growth in dividend, the constant growth model becomes inapplicable. So, the statement is correct.
So, here we have our correct statement and all others are incorrect.
Answer:
DR Allowance for Doubtful Accounts 2,000
CR Accounts Receivable—A. Hopkins 2,000
Explanation:
Because Gideon uses the allowance method, when a debt is written off, it will be written off from the allowance that was created for doubtful debts instead of directly to the bad debt account.
Accounts Receivable will be credited to show that it is decreasing and Allowance for Doubtful debt will be debited because expenses are debited when they increase.
Answer:
$80,000
Explanation:
From the information given:
2020 = $320000
= i.e. 2020 = $570000
= i.e. 2019 = $530000
Change = $570000 - $530000 = $40,000
= $2,500,000
= $2,300,000
Change = $2,500,000 - $2,300,000 = $ 200000
∴
= $320000 - $40,000 - $ 200000
= $80,000
