1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tankabanditka [31]
2 years ago
10

Gibbons v. Ogden addressed "interstate commerce,” which is

History
2 answers:
Svetlanka [38]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

commerce between states

Explanation:

I did this on edge 2020 got it correct

laila [671]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

You might be interested in
True or False: During the Middle Ages, the nobles supported the serfs by paying high<br> taxes.
blsea [12.9K]

False. They didn't support

5 0
2 years ago
What is the legal alternative to marriage in france in which couples receive many of the same legal rights as married couples wi
Marizza181 [45]
The correct answer is <span>civil solidarity pacts

The notion of marriage in most countries today is still revolving around the idea of a man and a woman. As it is changing and marriage is starting to incorporate people of the LGBT population or anything similar, then the country decided to make the civil solidarity pact enabled which makes you the same as if you're married, but you're not really married in the formal sense. </span>
6 0
3 years ago
On September 2, 1945, following the surrender of Japan and the end of World War II, General Douglas MacArthur
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

I think Mac was talking about if they would treat the Japanese well, then they will not be looking for revenge.  After World War 1, they treated the Germans really bad in the peace deal and France had ruthless occupation in the Rhineland of Germany. That why the NAZI party took power, people today wonder how can such people vote Hitler in and this is why. If they would treat the Japanese like how they treated the Germans after World War 1 , there would be no peace between the Japaneses and the Americans. America fought world war 2 not to bring japan horrific occupation but a occupation with justice.

Explanation:

The U.S had some Reconstruction plans that would save japan from a new dictatorship. Many people wanted japan to fall and have a ruthless occupation as revenge. What I mean by "ruthless" is take the wealth away from japan and as much of the land resources as possible for revenge. Mac Arthur knew this would not only cause unrest but revenge.

8 0
2 years ago
Read the text excerpt and answer the question that follows:
Ratling [72]
It was the nineteenth amendment, it made equal voting rights for men and women
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about the Siege at the Alamo is true?
zhuklara [117]

Answer:

B. It was a victory for the Mexican Army

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ANALYZING INFORMATION What was the significance of the Magna Carta?​
    7·1 answer
  • Martin van buren regarded a two-party system as essential to democratic government because __________.
    7·1 answer
  • What impact did World War I have on the Ottoman Empire? A. The Ottoman Empire ceded much of its territory, and European nations
    9·2 answers
  • What is the biggest contribution of the Hebrews?
    7·1 answer
  • Who was involved in the suger act 1764
    8·1 answer
  • How did the alliances formed by the European nations create a domino effect
    14·1 answer
  • Which is the number one way Islam spread throughout Afro-Eurasia?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the war end on both fronts?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of an important American institution?
    5·2 answers
  • 4 cons of democracy​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!