If the British economy is struggling, fewer tourists might visit Kenya.
Explanation:
Great Britain and Kenya are two countries that are on the opposite sides of the economic spectrum. The British have strong, well, developed, highly industrialized economy, being one of the most developed countries in the world. Kenya is a country that only recently started to move in the right direction. It is a developing country, and gradually it is moving forward, but is still way behind the level of the developed countries.
Despite these two countries not sharing a border, and being on different continents, they can have influence on each other when it comes to the economy. For example, Kenya is a country that focuses a lot of tourism, especially safari tourism. This type of tourism is mostly practiced by people from the developed countries, such as Great Britain. If the British economy starts to slow down, and it struggles, the people will lose their economic power, and will be less willing to spend on tourism. This will result in a decrease of tourist in Kenya, and with the tourism being such an important branch in its economy, it can be a big blow.
Learn more about developing countries brainly.com/question/1616250
#learnwithBrainly
B. economic hope that this is helpful enjoy.
<span>Rockefeller used the size of his company Standard Oil to negotiate preferential rates with railroad companies to transfer his oil in the refinement process. By gaining the upper hand in transportation costs, he was able to horizontally integrate his competitors into his firm working to establish a monopoly in the American oil industry. </span>
Answer:
virus originated in China, and later humans passed it to pigs near Fort Riley, KS. Inside the swine, the virus probably mutated into its more deadly form before being reintroduced to the American population.
Explanation:
<span>Charles Beard believed that the constitution was written by a group of rich people with economic interests. Beard believed that the reasons were financial interest and called the constitution a counterrevolution of the holders of bonds against ordinary people, farmers, and debtors. I argue that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were not the true motivation of the editors and were trying to protect their wealth. The authors were rich and powerful men who did things like allow slavery to continue and the contradiction of their speeches.</span>
