Not sure what the actual question is but I believe it’s either A or C.
Answer:
option B.
It's a good idea to be aware of a group or individual's agenda before we allow their message to affect our decisions because bias or motives can affect a message no matter how honest the source.
Explanation:
- Inclination towards any subject is directly dependent upon one's motive.
- No matter how honest is the source but his thoughts always reflects the biased opinion according to their agenda and motive.
- So it is always a better option to be aware about the factor that can affect our decision making.
- Get idea from every possible sources and filter it according to their background and agenda.
Answer:
Deductive argument.
Explanation:
A deductive argument can be defined as a type of argument that begins with a factual statement to draw a conclusion. It is a factual and logical reasoning. This argument states that if the premises are true that the conclusion drawn must be true as well.
It applies a 'top-bottom' principle which means that first general statements are made then these statements are narrowed to reach the conclusion.
<u>In the given statement, two premises are stated either Jack can enroll in full-time school or buy a car. Then the statement got narrowed when he thought to enroll in a full-time school than buying a car. Then the conclusion drawn was that he had to put off buying the car</u>.
So, the correct answer is deductive reasoning.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
It might be humorous to you but the person might be affected emotionally and psychologically