Answer:
The answer is 11.2%
Explanation:
Cost of acquisition: $16 per share
Annual dividend: $1
The stock increases by $2 every year for 3 years. Therefore, we have:
First year is $16 per share
Second year is $18 per share
Third year is $20 per share.
The arithmetic average annual capital gain will be
($2/$16 + $2/$18 + $2/$20)/3
(0.125 + 0.111 + 0.1) / 3
0.336/3
0.112
Expressed as a percentage:
= 11.2%
Answer: D. I, II, and III.
Explanation:
The demand for investment funds determines the demand for loanable funds and when this is higher than the supply, the rate increases. The reverse it true. It therefore affects real interest rates.
The savings of households and business firms are the source of loanable funds so if these are high relative to demand, the rate will decrease. The reverse is true.
Government demand for funds will increase interest rates as the supply will decrease when the government borrows massively. The reverse is true.
All three therefore impart real interest rates.
Change in the price of the good results in the movement along the same demand curve.
Factors other than price results in the shift in demand curve.
A rightward shift in demand would increase the quantity demanded at all prices compared to the original demand curve.
While a left shift indicates decrease in demand.
In the given graph , there is a rightward shift of the demand curve from left to the right ( D1 to D2), Thus we can say that there is an increase in demand.
Answer:
The answer is that the net income under absorption costing would be higher than the net income under variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing are terms used in accounting contexts. Absorption costing, also known as full costing, incurs overhead costs when the product is sold; not before it. Variable costing, also referred to as direct costing, would include overhead costs during the period the costs occurred. In this condition, net income would be higher using absorption since overhead costs would not be included until the product is sold.
Because MP3 players cost less to make, if demand does not change, there will be more profit. This is because there would be the same amount demand and less money being made into making the product, meaning less expense, which means a bigger profit.
