The duration of Security P based on the info given will be 11 years.
<h3>How to calculate the time?</h3>
From the information given, Security P is a preferred stock and Security Z is a zero coupon bond that has 11 years remaining until maturity.
Therefore, the duration will be:
= (1 + y)/y
= (1 + 0.1)/0.1
= 1.1/0.1
= 11 years
Learn more about security on:
brainly.com/question/25720881
#SPJ1
Answer:
Option A is correct
Explanation:
Breakpoint are the investment packages at which agents offer investors sales charge discount that is the more you invest, the greater the discount on sales charge which the investor is entitled to.
Answer:
What???
Explanation:
Jens-Peter Clausen. Managing Director and DE GmbH Partner.
Katrin Clausen. Manager.
Im not sure if my answer is right ▪_▪
Answer:
The correct answer is A.
All other things being equal, in the early years of the asset's life, the amount of income shown <u>on the tax return will be higher than the amount of income shown on the income state.</u>
Here's why
Explanation:
In the United States, the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) is a depreciation system used for tax purposes.
It allows the capitalized cost of an asset to be recovered over a specified period via annual deductions. The MACRS system puts fixed assets into classes that have set depreciation periods.
This depreciation system allows an asset to be depreciated faster in the first years of an asset's life and slows depreciation later on. This is beneficial to businesses from a tax perspective.
This is logical, the less the value of an assets, the less the property tax applicable to it and so the company increases it's bottom line in tax savings whiles maximizing the useful life of the asset.
Cheers!
Answer:
b. The goals of the politician and the goals of the job seekers would not be aligned, since unemployed individuals would have a stronger incentive to remain unemployed
Explanation:
Unemployed people would have the incentive to seek employment so as to meet basic needs. But if the politician is already meeting that need, there would be no incentive for the unemployed to seek employment. So, the goal of the politician and job seekers aren't aligned.
