Answer:
1. anecdotal evidence
2. expert quotation
3. statistic
4. supporting fact
Explanation:
I just did it and got it right
Answer:
pa brainliest answer po follow me follow back and pa heart po thankssssss
Explanation:
no one would have believed in
he last years of the nineteenth century that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man’s and yet as mortal as his own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutnised and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinise the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water. With infinite complacency men went to and fro over this globe about their little affairs, serene in their assurance of their empire over matter. It is possible that the infusoria under the microscope do the same. No one gave a thought to the older worlds of space as sources of human danger, or thought of them only to dismiss the idea of life upon them as impossible or improbable.
<h3>H.G. Wells, The War of the Worlds</h3>
The single idea that the author developed about Alexander Freeman from the first line of the story is that he was a person that was used to gambling on a lot of things.
The first line of the story says"
- You were always a gambler.
The opening statements says that Alexander was a person that could put bets on just anything.
<h3>Alexander Freeman</h3>
It says that he was the kind of person that would bet if
- His brother would win a wrestling match.
- spring would come early.
Alexander was a slave that was credited for being good at gambling because he won these bets most of the time.
Read more about A Soldier for the Crown on:
brainly.com/question/18232437?referrer=searchResults
