Hesitant on moral grounds to<span> kill so many, </span>Crusoe<span> reasons that since </span>Friday<span> belongs </span>to<span> an enemy nation, the situation </span>can<span> be construed as a state of war in which </span>killing<span> is permissible.
</span>
Crusoe and Friday fall upon the cannibals and quickly overcome them with their superior weapons, allowing only four to escape.
Answer:
the number one I say no for number two I say yes for number three I say yes and for number four I say no
Explanation:
I think that because number three number four talk about important things
As the manifest destiny is a belief that states it was God's will that Americans spread over the entire continent, and to control and populate the country as they see fit. in fact, it was used before civil war to validate the acquisition of continental territories like oregon, for example.This is the central idea that the author suggests by Cordilia's ideas in her letter.
Out of all the pronouns, "whom" makes the most sense grammatically. This allows us to narrow it down to A or D.
In order for it to be the object of a preposition, there would have to be a preposition in front of it. "For," however is <em>not</em> a preposition. In fact, there isn't a preposition in the whole question.
This leaves us with option D, which is the correct answer.
You can better tell it's a direct object if you flip the sentence around a bit.
Your sister is waiting <em>for whom</em>?
"Whom" is essentially receiving the action. "Whom" is what your sister is waiting for.
Answer: D. whom; direct object.
Geijer’s comment supports MacGregor’s point because:
- It illustrates the popularity of tea in Britain during the 1800s.
<h3>What is the main point of the text?</h3>
The passage highlighted the importance of tea to the British people in the 1800s and the beginning of the 1900s.
The figures that were portrayed in the passage support the point that tea consumption now marked the lives of the Britons. So, option C is right.
As it got cheaper, tea also spread rapidly to the working classes. By 1800, as foreigners remarked, it was the new national drink. By 1900 the average tea consumption per person in Britain was a staggering 6 lbs (3 kilograms) a year. In 1809 the Swede Erik Gustav Geijer commented:
Next to water, tea is the Englishman's proper element. All classes consume it . . . in the morning one may see in many places small tables set up under the open sky, around which coal-carters and workmen empty their cups of delicious beverage.
Learn more about tea consumption in Britain here:
brainly.com/question/25757128
#SPJ1
