Hi!
<em>Option C is correct.</em>
<em></em>
Explanation of the choices:
A. - This seems a good choice, however it's not the best choice. Let's come back to it.
B. - This is the best choice because they get to experience first-hand how to manage and make their own money decisions. Choice A might seem good at first, but we can see this is better because they get to make their own decisions and experience hands-on how to do it.
C - This is not a good choice, because it's best to expose children early so they can grow up knowing how to do it.
D - This choice doesn't make sense. What is the point of money if you store it away and don't spend it? This will likely not be a good lesson in the future.
Hope this helps! :D
Answer: True
Explanation:
Strategic decisions do indeed take long-term commitment because they are meant to help the company in the long term not the short.
Strategic decisions usually set goals and achieve results in the long term. They are not expected to yield results in the short terms which is why MacDonald's pressed on with the all-day breakfast despite initial challenges.
<span>To keep the tulips from bending as they often do, you tie them with raffia, a technique known as B. skeletonizing
This type of technique helps the flowers be tied together. The raffia is used like a skeleton for the flowers to stand straight. It supports the tulips, preventing them from bending. </span>
Answer: (D) Poor leader-member relations
Explanation:
In the poor leader member relationship, the member of the group are poor and the leaders focus are mainly shift away from the task in type specific group. It raises the poor conflicts and behavior in the relations of the group members.
The contingency model is one of the important business contingency theory which focus on the leadership effectiveness in the specific organization. This theory is mainly developed by the Fred fiedler.
Therefore, Option (D) is correct.
Answer:
yup I think that tooooooo