In comparing group and individual insurance, group insurance provides:

True or False: When refusing an internal request, it is not a good idea to provide an alternative.

Lana71 [14]

Answer:

1st question: false Refusing internal requests often calls for an indirect strategy. Providing adequate reasons and realistic alternatives helps maintain goodwill and a positive working environment.

2nd question: True. Refusals for routine requests should open with a buffer, a neutral statement on which both readerand writer can agree, and should transition into the reasons.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Frank noticed that Anna missed making their monthly sales quotas at a large auto dealer. He thinks this happened because she lac

masha68 [24]

Answer: Fundamental attributional error.

Explanation:

Frank is making a fundamental attributional error when judging the cause of Anna's inability to meet sales target. Frank is blaming her failure based on her character rather than on the real reason which is the attractive sales offer of their competitors. Fundamental attributional error is an error which arises from judging a person's action based on their character without considering other possible external causes.

8 0

3 years ago

A fast-food restaurant has determined that the chance a customer will order a soft drink is 0.90. The proba- bility that a custo

azamat

Answer:

(a) The probability that the order will include a soft drink and no fries is 0.45.

(b) The probability that the order will include a hamburger and fries is 0.48.

Explanation:

Let the events be denoted as follows:

S = an order of soft drink

H = an order of hamburger

F = an order of french fries.

Given:

P (S) = 0.90

P (H) = 0.60

P (F) = 0.50

(a)

It is provided that the event of ordering a soft drink and fries are independent.

If events A and B are independent then the probability of event (A ∩ B) is:

$P(A\cap B)=P(A)\times P(B)$

Compute the probability that the order will include a soft drink and no fries as follows:

$P(S\cap \bar F)=P(S)\times P(\bar F)\\=P(S)\times[1-P(F)]\\=0.90\times (1-0.50)\\=0.45$

Thus, the probability that the order will include a soft drink and no fries is 0.45.

(b)

It is provided that the conditional probability that a customer will order fries given that he/she has already ordered a hamburger as, P (F|H) = 0.80.

The conditional probability of an event B given another event A has already occurred is:

$P(B|A)=\frac{P(A\cap B}{P(A)}$

Compute the probability that the order will include a hamburger and fries as follows:

$P(F|H)=\frac{P(H\cap F)}{P(H)}\\P(H\cap F)=P(F|H)\times P(H)\\=0.80\times 0.60\\=0.48$

Thus, the probability that the order will include a hamburger and fries is 0.48.

6 0

3 years ago

Cash flows from investing activities include: Multiple Choice Cash outflows from acquiring land. Proceeds from the issuance of c

SOVA2 [1]

Cash flows<em> from investing</em> activities contain the following things and include:

Cash outflows from acquiring land

According to the given question, we are asked to state what the cash flow from investing activities contains based on the list of available choices.

As a result of this, we can see that cash flows which are gotten from investing activities includes the cash that has either been made or spent on a fixed asset like land or properties that are expected to generate profit in the future.

Therefore, the correct answer is Cash outflows from acquiring land

Read more cash flows here:

brainly.com/question/735261

4 0

2 years ago

Your firm is considering a project that will cost $ 4.548 million up front, generate cash flows of $ 3.50 million per year for

Alika [10]

Answer:

(a) It will have multiple IRRs

(b) The MIRR calculated is 10.18% . Going by MIRR result , this project will only generate returns that is equal to cost of capital(10%) .If there are other avaible more viable projects, it should be rejected ( Please see attached computation).

Explanation:

(a) The multiple IRRs occurs when cash flows change sign and result in more than one value for the IRR.

Application of IRR to value an investment is only suitable when the project has normal cash flows, i.e a negative initial cash flow (i.e initial investment) followed by a series of positive cash flows.

In this scenario, we have negative cash flow of $6m in year 4 which occured after positive cash flow of $3.5m per year from year 1 to 3. This typically make IRR unreliable. To overcome this limitation , we can use Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)

(b) Please see attached for more details.

Download xlsx

4 0

3 years ago