Answer: Objectively reasonable
Explanation:
Objectively reasonable standard is the guideline that must be followed by police department as per regulation of Supreme court for using force.This regulation suggest that actions taken by police should have certain reason along with evidence and facts.
These actions should not persist any personal feeling or hidden motive for examining and carrying out actions.Thus, it is expected that police must be objectively reasonable .
Answer:
Judaism and Christianity are two monotheistic, ethical religions which share a part of their scriptures in common; the Bible or Tanakh of the Jews is the Old Testament of the Christians.
The correct answer would be option C, Emotional Component.
Ms. Kozena's negative feeling about junk food best illustrates the Emotional Component of Attitudes.
Explanation:
There are three main components of attitudes. These components are as follows:
- Affective Component
- Behavioral Component and
- Cognitive Component
This model of attitude is also called the ABC model of attitude.
In the Affective component of the attitude, Emotional component comes. This component shows or refers to an emotional reaction that one may have towards an attitude or object or anything.
So when Ms. Kozena told her adolescent children that she gets upset when she sees her children eating junk food, is a side of emotional component in which she has a negative attitude towards eating junk food.
Learn more about Attitude components at:
brainly.com/question/3045586
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Geographical immobility
Occupational immobility
Capital immobility
Explanation:
Geographical immobility, difficulty in moving from one region to another.
Occupational immobility, when there is difficulty in moving from one type of job to another.
Capital immobility, if there is a rapid structural change in the economy, to keep up to date with changing nature of the economy.
The third statement is correct.
Nick, who was our dorm advisor, and Joe, Nick's roommate, raised their concerns to the school residence office. They wanted to know why Dennis didn't have to share a room.
In the first statement, there are two subjects- Nick and Joe. However, "his" is used in the predicate referring only to one of the two subjects. This made the sentence incorrect. The same with the second statement. It used not only "his" in the first sentence, but it also used "he" in the second sentence referring to only one of the two subjects mentioned, instead of "they".
