1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liberstina [14]
3 years ago
13

This graph would MOST LIKELY be used by one who

History
1 answer:
34kurt3 years ago
4 0

Answer: D I think

They both have to do with manufacturing while the others dont

You might be interested in
Over the years, the Supreme Court has shifted to permit _____
Leno4ka [110]
Over the years, the Supreme Court has shifted to permit more state restrictions on abortions. Each state can determine whether they want to permit abortions and they can restrict how long the mother can be pregnant before the abortion. The correct answer is D. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
______ branded their cattle to identify the animals they ______.​
blondinia [14]

Answer: ranchers branded their cattle to identify the animals they own

Explanation:

Ranchers typically brand their cattle, so they don’t accidentally take another ranchers cattle.

7 0
2 years ago
What did the great Compromise and the three-fifths compromise involve so much debate and discussion at the constitutional conven
evablogger [386]

Answer:  Because each state was looking out for its personal interests in regard to representation in Congress.

Details:

The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on  the representation of states in Congress.   Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.  

  • The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states.  The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size.  The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation.  The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature.  Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population.  In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
  • The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery.  For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures.  (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.)   The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
5 0
3 years ago
Why did the first fighting of the French and Indian war occur?
abruzzese [7]

Answer:

well the french and the british wanted control of known as today usa so the had a war the french made friends with the natives and had a larger army than the british but towards the end of the war the british set up a blockade and stopped the french from getting more troops

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Write 2 precedents and explain WHY they were important.
777dan777 [17]
Abraham Lincoln: He advocated for freeing slaves and fought for the Union.
Trump: Avoided war with Korea, created more jobs
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where had most African Americans come from in the Harlem of the 1920s?
    12·2 answers
  • TRUE OR FALSE:
    9·1 answer
  • Which modern institution was born in medieval Europe?
    12·2 answers
  • Why is the Tenth Amendment important to states? please answer in paragraph format!
    15·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
    5·1 answer
  • This Greek gladiatorial physician gained knowledge of anatomy with immediate access to deceased gladiators. Name
    9·2 answers
  • No not at all Treaty organization was formed to protect the
    13·1 answer
  • Freaks=
    11·1 answer
  • Do you think Reagan administration officials were justified in violating congressional laws in the Iran-Contra incident? Explain
    9·1 answer
  • A time for choosing speech summary and purpose
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!