I believe that you are experiencing a shy or embarrassed feeling. (>_<)
Answer:
B. It increased, but it less than doubled
Explanation:
Real GDP per person is defined as the total economic output divided by the total number of people. It is used in roughly indicating the standard of living.
An increased in the nominal GDP 3 times its formal will lead to a proportionate increase in the GDP per person statistics. But I was a noted that there was a 100% increase in population, meaning that population doubled. This indicates that the GDP per person increased but it less than double because of the population doubling in that period of time.
Based on accounting principles, a $1 per unit tax levied on consumers of a good is equivalent to "a $1 per unit tax levied on producers of the good."
This is based on the idea that the market reaches the exact equilibrium price irrespective of who is accountable for paying the money to the government.
In other words, when the government levies a tax on a good, producers are not exempted from the tax levy because that money will be recouped from the producers' sales or revenue.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that tax on goods is inevitable to consumers and producers.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/22680521
Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
<u>To calculate the activities rates, we need to use the following formula on each pool:</u>
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Pool 1= 20,000/10,000= $2 per direct labor dollar
Pool 2= 15,000/50= $300 per setup
Pool 3= 10,000/200= $50 per hour
<u>Now, we can allocate costs to each product:</u>
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Product A:
Pool 1= 2*4,000= 8,000
Pool 2= 300*20= 6,000
Pool 3= 50 *50= 2,500
Total allocated costs= $16,500
Product B:
Pool 1= 2*6,000= 12,000
Pool 2= 300*30= 9,000
Pool 3= 50 *150= 7,500
Total allocated costs= $28,500
The systematic response coefficient from inflation, would result in a change in any security return of <u>3.2 βI</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
<em><u>Given</u></em>:
Expected rate of inflation = 3%
Actual rate of inflation = 6.2%
The change in security return can be calculated by obtaining the differences between actual and expected levels of inflation.
Change in security return= Actual rate of inflation- Expected rate of inflation
= 6.2%-3%
= 3.2%
<u>Change in security return= 3.2 βI
</u>
<u></u>
