Answer:
$50 billion
Explanation:
To find the change in aggregate expenditures, we need to find the change in consumption. For this, we will use the marginal propensity to consume formula:
MPC = ΔC/ΔY
Where:
MPC = Marginal propensity to consume
ΔC = Change in consumption
ΔY = Change in output (GDP)
We know that out MPC is 0.5, and our ΔY is $billion. We plug these amounts into the formula:
0.5 = ΔC / 100 billion
And we rearrange the equation to solve for ΔC
ΔC = $ 100 billion x 0.5
ΔC = $50 billion
So the change in consumption is $50 billion, which is also the change in aggregate expenditure.
<u><em>You should spend a large amount of time thinking about a big decision before you make it because it could have a huge impact in your life. You need to be able to decide if it is the right or wrong choice or if there is any consequences.</em></u>
Forgone output is the fundamental economic cost of unemployment. So, output (option (b)) is the right choice.
<h3>Forgone labour output </h3>
Forgone labour output is the amount of money that persons would have made over the course of their remaining working lives, discounted to the current year if they had not passed away too soon. Forgone labour production, like other accounting metrics like the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), is not meant to represent a gauge of society's prosperity. This brings us to the welfare-based approach, which is the second method for estimating the costs of premature death.
The potential for the production of goods and services is lost forever when the economy fails to provide enough jobs for everyone who is able and willing to work.
Learn more about Forgone labour output here:
brainly.com/question/16690539
#SPJ4
Answer:
True
Explanation:
If there is a more number of compounding periods within a year so it would result into the higher price of future value for lump sum investment in year 0 but the case would be adverse with the present value i.e there is less amount in the present value with regard to lumpsum amount i.e to be recieved in the future date
Hence, the given statement is true
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": flexible in both directions.
Explanation:
The ability that an individual, family or group of people develop to improve or worsen their economic condition is called economic mobility. It is measured in income terms and particularly, in the U.S. is flexible in both directions since, according to studies, Americans have proved to be able to get better living conditions but some of them have gone from good economic situations to poverty.
