Answer:
a. No. A state court will do a better job in this case because it exercises unlimited jurisdiction. Moreover, you can only bring your case to a federal court if the amount of your claim is up to $75,000 or the issue is exclusive to the federal court. This is not the case here.
b. Yes and No. We need some additional information about the accident location to help answer this question definitively.
c. No. You should not consider accepting the offered settlement. The jury award is meant to pay for your medical bills and also to help you recover financially as though the accident did not happen in the first place. Accepting any lesser amount after the judgment is rendered is in bad taste. The other party should have negotiated to settle out of court before the final judgment was rendered. But it did not. So, go with the jury award.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Missed work for 15 weeks
Total medical bills incurred = $50,000
Total lost wages incurred = $15,000
Jury award = $100,000 ($50,000 for medical, $15,000 for lost wages and $35,000 for punitive damages)
Settlement offer = $50,000
Note:
I wasn't able to access the Chester Income Statement but I successfully accessed a similar question Digby.
The Complete Question is as under:
Refer to the HR Reports in the Inquirer. Through past investments in recruiting and training Digby has obtained a productivity index of 109.6%. This means that Digby's labor costs would be increased by 9.6% if it did not have these productivity improvements. This is a competitive advantage that Digby can sustain or even widen further if its competitors have no HR initiatives. Now, refer to the Income Statement in Digby's Annual Report. How much did Digby's productivity improvements save it in direct labor costs (in thousands) last year?
A. $766
B. $29818
C. $3137
D. $3211
Answer:
Option D. $3,137
Explanation:
The Productivity Index of 9.6% shows that if the improvement plan is implemented then the efficiency gains would result in saving of 9.6% of total direct cost. So if we total the direct cost for the year for all of the four products then we have an amount of $32,680 which is given at the second last column.
The amount saved last year would be:
Savings = $32,680 * 9.6% = $3,137
Hence the option C is correct here.
Answer: The answer is True.
Explanation: The Buyer Decision process has 5 phases and they are as follows:
1. Need recognition phase, where the buyer recognizes that they have a need to fill.
2. Information search phase, where the buyer seeks information on the best options to meet their needs.
3. Alternative evaluation phase, where a buyer evaluates the alternative enterprises that can best meet their needs.
4. The purchasing phase, where a buyer makes the decision to purchase the product or service of the best alternative, based on the evaluation in phase 3.
5. Post-purchase behavior phase where the buyer will either be happy with the product or service or will regret buying the product or service. Often, the buyer will advice other people to either buy or avoid buying that product or service, based on their experience.
<span>The Constitution makes it clear that the Congress, rather than the President of the United States, has power to assign</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": industry-wide differentiation strategy.
Explanation:
An industry-wide differentiation strategy aims to broaden the scope of a business that is specially dedicated to the retail of products of a certain industry. The company keeps focusing on the same industry but supplying more related products consumers their typical consumers are likely to purchase. Part of the strategy implies reaching new markets, thus, investment in new locations might be necessary.
