Answer:
further expands on the direct confrontations of colonialism by stating, “[T]he impacts of colonialism were similar, regardless of the specific colonizer: disease; destruction of indigenous social, political, and economic structures; repression; exploitation; land displacement; and land degradation”
Explanation:
Answer:
Three-fifths compromise, compromise agreement between delegates from the Northern and the Southern states at the United States Constitutional Convention (1787) that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.
Explanation:
this was made due to disputes over the idea that slaves could count for a states overall population, and if that was the case several southern states would have a large influence due to a large population of slaves. hence the agreement that a slave could only count for 3/5th of a man, reducing the overall influence/'population' of the southern states.
The State Prosecutor is responsible for bringing charges against someone suspected of committing a crime in their state's jurisdiction. The third choice is correct.
Slaves thay dident whant to give them that power
Miranda vs. Arizona = read rights before questioning
Gideon vs. Wainwright = anyone who can’t afford a lawyer will be provided one
Expanded individual rights
Hope it helps
