Answer:
e. Sunk cost.
Explanation:
As per the given statement, the best appropriate option is sunk cost. As the sunk cost deals with the past cost which is already incurred in the past and it cannot be changed or avoided, neither it can be recovered. Example - Rent expense.
Plus it does not affect the future decisions that means it is irrelevant for decision-making aspects.
Answer:
to survive today, organizations need to be present in both the online and physical markets
Explanation:
So far Amazon has dominated the online space when it comes to buying products and services. But the scenario in the question makes it clear that having only one channel open to customers (online) is not sufficient.
It is necessary to diversify by having physical stores in addition to online stores.
Some consumers for example will want to examine what they are buying before paying, others will not have the patience to wait for delivery of goods. So the physical store will serve these segments of customer's.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
If an investment project can be repeated, i.e. its life cycle can be extended by reinvesting, the NPV of the project will change.
When considering two mutually exclusive projects, the NPV method should always be considered before the IRR as a means of evaluating which project should be carried out.
Answer:
S1
Explanation:
Law of Supply, is the law which states or claims that all else being constant or equal, then the quantity supplied of the good increases when the price of the goods also increases.
Ans this states the positive relationship among the price and the quantity, thus an upward sloping curve. Therefore, it is the curve (supply curve), which is more likely for the CDs.
This curve shows the relationship among the amount that the sellers willing to and able to supply and the price of the CDs, which is called as the quantity of CDs supplied.
Answer: Reformation
Explanation: In simple words, reformation refers to a process in which something is changed in the current subject to set it again on the right path.
In the given case, the judge believes that the time period set for avoiding the competition is unusually long. Thus, they can reform the contract to make it suitable and justified for all the parties involved.
