Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
Answer:
daniel should have focused on the message and not on the way it was delivered.
Explanation:
If Daniel had focused more on getting the message that was being passed by Kirk Douglas, he would have enjoyed the show more.
But in this case he was more focused on how Kirk Douglas was not accurately forming his words. The more he listened the more frustrated he became.
Answer:
B. Globally conscious.
Explanation:
Millenials are the generation of people born in the 80s and 2000s, and represent people who were born at a time when technology and the internet were strengthened, which caused a revolution in the form of social interactions around the world.
The internet revolutionized business, due to the speed in the exchange of information, it was possible for business to expand and integrate, which generated globalization, which is the interaction of businesses between countries in search of competitive and strategic advantages in the global market.
Therefore, it is correct to say that the generation of millennials are more globally aware employees, due to the fact that they have grown up in a cultural and social environment marked by the use of the internet and the availability of information, which makes them more aware about business. global interactions, multicultural interactions and more possibilities to understand the market and contribute to its development.
Answer:
Explanation:
a)
The YTM of the bond at par value is equals to its coupon rate, 8.75%. Other things being equal, this 4% coupon rate bond will be more eye-catching as the coupon rate is lower than the current market yields, and its price is far below the call price. So, if yields drop, capital gains on the bond will not be restricted by the call price.
b)
If an investor foresees that yields will fall considerably, the 4% bond proposes a better expected return.
c)
Implicit call protection is offered in the sense that any likely fall in yields would not be nearly enough to make the firm consider calling the bond. In this sense, the call feature is almost irrelevant
Answer:
a fear appeal
Explanation:
Fear appeal is the strategy that induces fear in an individual with the aim of preventing a particular behaviour.
Usually a risk is presented to person and the consequences of taking a particular action is highlighted.
Fear appeal emphasises the negative aspects of a situation to discourage the participants from acting a particular way.
It is an important tool in malong positive change in an individual's attitudes, intentions, and behaviours.
