1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
a_sh-v [17]
3 years ago
8

Which of these had the BIGGEST impact on Georgia’s agriculture?

History
1 answer:
Maru [420]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Option D, The Great Depression, is the right answer.

Explanation:

The Stock Market Crash of the year 1929 was the inception of the Economic Depression in the history of the United States. The economy of the south including Georgia was badly hit by the Great Depression. Georgia saw the failure of cotton in the decades of the 1910's and 1920's which meant even before the depression of 1929. In the year 1929, when the whole stock market collapsed, the prices of various commodities as well as agricultural goods fell as well. The shock destroyed the agricultural economy of Georgia because farmers could no longer expect high prices for their crops.

You might be interested in
Ten laws and teaching said to have been given to Moses by god
Romashka [77]

Answer:

It was the 10 Commandments.

Long ago, God gives Moses the Arc of Covenant it's a golden chest with two flat rocks inside where the 10 Commandments are written but suddenly it become gone forever but there aee list survived

4 0
2 years ago
In what ways does the Magna Carta promote the idea that even the king must be subject to the rule of law? What responsibilities
IrinaVladis [17]

On June 15, 1215, a disgruntled group of landed barons achieved a great if very short-lived victory over the reigning monarch of the time, King John.  That victory was the king’s consent to a document presented for his stamp that limited the monarch’s authorities vis-à-vis his subjects.  That document, the Magna Carta, was a detailed list of demands and principles that were intended to protect these elites from the tyranny of a king with unchecked powers.   This limitation on the taxation of the king’s subjects, and its prohibition on the enforced requisition of those subjects’ crops and other properties, remained a pillar of democratic thought for centuries to come, and was reissued several times over the ensuing years until it finally stuck.  Its influence on the British subjects residing in the Crown’s North American colonies who were contemplating the text of what would become the Constitution of the United States was considerable.  Those rebellious colonies were heavily influenced by the intellectual developments characteristic of the Age of Enlightenment, but central to those developments remained the principles established in the Magna Carta.  That this nation’s founders were similarly influenced by the 1215 document is evident in Alexander Hamilton’s essay defending the draft constitution and advocating for its ratification.  In that essay, designated Federalist Paper #84, Hamilton wrote the following:    “It has been several times truly remarked that bills of rights are, in their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, abridgements of prerogative in favor of privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to the prince. Such was Magna Charta, obtained by the barons, sword in hand, from King John. Such were the subsequent confirmations of that charter by succeeding princes. Such was the Petition of Right assented to by Charles I., in the beginning of his reign. Such, also, was the Declaration of Right presented by the Lords and Commons to the Prince of Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown into the form of an act of parliament called the Bill of Rights.”   In that passage, Hamilton recognizes the enduring influence of the Magna Carta, and of the document’s role in the evolution of political thought through the ensuing centuries.  The concept of limitations on the power of a ruler had sufficient appeal that it survived many monarchs’ efforts at resisting the relinquishment of authority the document stipulated.  The American Bill of Rights was a direct outgrowth of the evolution of political thought that didn’t begin with the Magna Carta, but for which the document represented perhaps its most important manifestation to date.


6 0
3 years ago
Confucianism stresses all of the following except O stressing love for humanity O ancestor worship independence for children O h
mel-nik [20]

Answer:

Confucianism, also known as Ruism, is a system of thought and behavior originating in ancient China. Variously described as tradition, a philosophy, a religion, a humanistic or rationalistic religion, a way of governing, or simply a way of life,[

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST HURRY PLEASE How did the issue of prohibition divide the Texas Democratic Party?
shtirl [24]

Answer:

A month after the Democratic conference, Senator Carter Glass of Virginia, a. Democratic leader who received 78 votes for the presidential nomination in 1924, reasserted in his speech of April 5 at Asheville that “prohibition is not a party issue.” The speech was of interest both for its comments on the candidacy of Governor Smith of New York and as a disclosure of the reasoning that prevailed in the Democratic conference.

“Prohibition was not passed by the Democrats or by the Republicans,” Senator Glass said, “but by men of both parties and with no regard for party lines. It was a moral issue, So why in heaven's name should the Democrats make the eighteenth amendment a party issue in the next national campaign, as though electing a wet President would affect the prohibition law? If they do they might just as well take the presidency to the Republicans on a silver platter…They might just as well take their party out and dump it on the scrap heap.”If the Democratic party nominated Governor Smith as “an avowed exponent of the movement to repeal or modify the eighteenth amendment” or should it make prohibition an issue by platform declaration, Senator Glass said, the Democratic candidate would be “badly beaten” and the party “irretrievably wrecked.” He explained at the same time that “the presidency means nothing in the fight for modification,” that the President could not change the Constitution, and that his influence with Congress on such an issue “would be negligible,” In view of these facts Senator Glass believed the modification issue had no place in a presidential platform or a presidential campaign.

Explanation:

Here is just some information to get you started. I copied this off the web, so you cannot use it as direct writing, because that would be copy-right.

I promise you this is not a scam, but the rest of the information or the website I got the information from is linked below.

https://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre1927042300

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do I mark brainliest
astraxan [27]

Answer:

Not sure to be honest but i would assume you like right click on the person or there should usually be a 3 dot button that has options

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In which of the following ways is New Zealand's government different from Australia's?
    7·2 answers
  • Wilson’s Fourteen Points speech dealt with the causes of the War, boundary changes and called for the formation of a League of _
    11·1 answer
  • Why were American buildings in Lebanon attacked?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a result of the French and Indian War?
    6·2 answers
  • Which text is essential to the practice of Islam?
    15·2 answers
  • Board of education v earls relatability to present day ? <br> i need one paragraph.
    10·1 answer
  • What is the message of this political cartoon?
    6·1 answer
  • Southern colony key groups
    10·1 answer
  • How did Betty Friedan's book The Feminine Mystique affect the lives of everyday Americans?
    14·1 answer
  • How did populists appeal to organized labor?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!