The answer is "jumping to conclusions".
Jumping to conclusions is a mental term alluding to a correspondence snag where one "judge[s] or decide[s] something without having every one of the actualities; to achieve unjustifiable conclusions". As it were, "the point at which I neglect to recognize what I watched direct from what I have just gathered or assumed". Because it includes settling on choices without having enough data to make sure they are correct, this can offer ascent to terrible or impulsive choices.
A democracy is a type of system of government where the people or the population have a choice in the election polls
Salutary Neglect -> free market economy
Separation of powers -> three branches of government
English common laws -> basis of us laws
The group's performance is likely to be low because the group fails to change dysfunctional norms, when there is high conformity and low deviance in a group.
High-status deviance has such actions as making fewer contributions to task performance or exercising less influence in the group's discussion.
The answer that fits the statement above is a CLASSICAL CONDITIONING THEORIST. Classical conditioning is referred to as a learning procedure wherein the person or the organism or animal is being taught with the use of different stimulus. This is a way that the organism is able to associate something with its environment.
