Since this is an opinion question you can take it either way.
Pros:
- lower speed may cause lower speed accidents, which are less deadly than their high speed alternatives
- lower speed could potentially allow people to get lost less often because they are able to navigate and respond earlier
<span>- gas savings from optimal operating conditions (between 88.5 - 96.5 km/h [55-60 mph])</span>
Cons:
- longer commute times
- less enjoyable (if you enjoy driving fast)
- may contribute to overall congestion and increase in accidents as people spend more time on average on the roads
Either way, support our opinion and you'll be right.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Both of them explain certain and specific evidence to help support their numbers which gives them an example of what they impact and how they can change it by changing certain possibilities. They also both describe how if they do change certain things it will not only help now but also in the long run.
A comma "
for example
"He loved trees."
Answer:
B. Kennedy inspires citizens to do their part when he says, "the energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring...will light our country" and "can truly light the world".
Explanation:
The above selected option is the correct and effective use of a direct quotation and explanation to support the analysis of the speech.
This is true because the option actually explains what Kennedy's quotation is doing to the hearers - it inspires them to do something. It shows how the direct quotation is used to explain how Kennedy inspires the citizens with his speech. In the explanation to support the analysis of the speech, <em>"..."</em> and <em>"and"</em> are used to connect the relevant sentences.
Therefore, Option B is the correct answer.
