Garrett Hardin argues for a very harsh thesis: we simply should not provide aid to people in poor countries. His argument is consequentialist: he claims that the net result of doing so would be negative -- would in fact be courting large-scale disaster. One of the things that we will notice about Hardin's essay, however, is that whether he is right or wrong, he paints with a very broad brush. This makes it a good essay for the honing of your philosophical skills; you should notice that there are many places where the reasoning procees with less than total care. Hardin begins with metaphors. He points out that while the metaphor of earth as a grand spaceship has a certain popularity (or did 23 years ago) .
I don't why but I think Its promise
as many almost all breaks it
and next is not lie I'm sure everyone in the world has lied
*in my opinion*
A complex situation that often involves an apparent mental conflict between moral imperatives, in which to obey one would result in transgressing another.
Answer: D. Save Water
Explanation:
If they did not want to wash plates and switched to paper plates for lunches as well as brought in water from other places, they were trying to save water.
? What question do you have