I'm pretty sure it would be the second bubble. Cannot be surrendered. Hope this helps! =^-^=
Answer:
They put the source to give credit to the "owner/s" of the cited photo shown.
Explanation:
They cited the source to give credit to the place where they got it. If they had not cited the source, it would be deemed plagiarism and the person who used the photo would be fined.
Technically speaking, it would be "family" that represents a social group that exists in all known cultures, since families are generally crucial for the survival of the individual.
Generally speaking, judicial activism is the opposite of judicial restraint in that when a judge is especially "active," he or she imposes more of his or her own will in the case, whereas if a judge is more "restrained," they rely more on precedent.
