Answer:
C. A god intervening in human affairs
Explanation:
Being able to have a sticky piece of paper and to have reminders or good notes on it
In this article, the author talks about the definition of the term herd behaviour when it applies to humans. This is a behaviour that people sometimes adopt and which leads them to act in irrational ways or with panic. When people follow this behaviour, they act in the way in which they perceive the crowd to act, even when this is not beneficial or logical.
Paragraph 7 provides an example of this type of thinking in action. In this paragraph, we learn of the way in which Hitler used this tendency to gain support for his cause. By providing this example, paragraph 7 allows the reader to think of what the behaviour looks like in action. It also allows the reader to better appreciate the consequences of herd behaviour in real life.
In the excerpt above, the sentence is a _compound-complex sentence_.
This one makes the most sense.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "[4] Paine’s logic is indisputable; without his words, America might have remained subject to British rule to this day." This is the <span>sentence that should be revised to make this summary more objective</span>
