Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": a result of more efficient resource allocation than would be observed in the absence of trade.
Explanation:
Trade has allowed societies to exchange their products according to their needs. Thanks to trade those goods are distributed accordingly more <em>efficiently </em>since, in isolation, countries would be specialists of certain types of products only which is unlikely to be enough to cover all the individuals' needs in those societies.
Answer:
The answer is C. link the advertisements to online promotions.
Explanation:
Now lets take a look at it one by one and see why C is the answer.
As in option A, she can ask a few friends whether they've seen the ad or not, but their replies would not accurately show the success of the promotion strategy.
In Option B, it take some time to measure the results and the quarterly sales numbers can be influenced by many factors and may not reflect the impact of this specific promotional campaign.
Option D is irrelevant, Elise's company sales and the sales of the newspapers are not related. So we can not take this as an answer.
Option C however is very applicable. If you link the advertisements to online promotions, when those who read the news paper comes to check the online promotion, we can see how well has the ad performed based on the number of online enrollments of the readers.
The answer is: Consumerism
Consumerism refers to a view that encourage the purchase of goods and services. Companies can contribute to consumerism during their marketing campaign. During the campaign, they would do many things to make their products seems desirable , which would encourage the consumers to buy their products.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Neither Italy or New Zealand.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability of an individual or organization to manufacture its products at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. The scenario does not imply the individual has an absolute advantage. It actually means it sacrifices less to achieve that goal.
Thus, <em>Portugal has a lower opportunity cost than Italy in producing a bottle of wine. Portugal's opportunity cost is 1/2 while Italy's opportunity cost is 2. Neither Italy or New Zealand (or any other country not mentioned in the example) has a comparative advantage in producing wine</em>.
