I would rather have a President over a King because with a president you can say no and take votes, but with a king, he decides all of the rules.
Answer:
<em>paturo</em><em> </em><em>ka</em><em> </em><em>wag</em><em> </em><em>puro</em><em> </em><em>brainly</em><em> </em><em>hays</em>
The correct answer is - Exports grew significantly in the 1820's.
This graph shows us the exports of opium by the British toward China. Starting from the year of 1729 the exports of opium in China constantly grew, though relatively slowly. In 1790 there's significant rise in the exports, but that it kind of stagnates and the growth is minimal in next three decades.
<em>From the begging of the 1820's to the end of the 1820's the exports of opium start to grow very quickly. The rise in exports was so quick that in just this decade the exports of opium went up by around three times (tripled).</em>
That trend of rapid growth in the opium exports continued in the next decade, the 1830's, as well.
The colonists opposed the taxes imposed after the French and Indian War
because they claimed that since the colonies had no representation in
parliament, Parliament had no right to tax them.The British
parliament was of the opinion that this was the
way they could cover the cost of the French and Indian War. This
actually was
the basis for a greater revolution among the colonists in the later
stages.
Go back to North America. Give the colonists some representation in Parliament and a little more ‘freedom’ to rule and re-write laws and economic policies (taxes). This would have appeased some of the revolutionary leaders and most of the common people. This may have led to a diplomatic, not militaristic, resolution to the grievances of the colonies that were eventually written in the Dec. of Indep.
