The Voting Rights act of 1965 declared that no new election laws could be enacted in any state without approval from the Department of Justice. In place of approval it can also be said that without prior clearance from the Department of Justice, it is not possible for any person in the United States of America to hold elections.
<span />
Answer:
Looking at African settlement organization as a traditional pattern implies a lack of modernity. However, according to one estimate, traditional dwellings and settlements make up between 8 and 9 million households in a variety of urban and rural settings
Explanation:
Settlement patterns The similarities existing between the domestic architecture of the Ndebele and that of the Pedi was also extended to their settlement forms. Historically the larger Ndebele settlement was built in the shape of an open fan, with a large circular space containing the cattle byre and the gathering place for the men being
I don’t know what number but I can help.
Say the phone was $271 and it went up ten percent
Try taking 200 and it’s 10% more. If you don’t know you take the first two digits and add a decimal in front of the last zero. You have 20 dollars. If you do that with the $271 do this $27.10 because if you take the first two digits and add a decimal before the one you have $27.1
The correct answer is C) the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive.
Until 1987, in cases of extradition, the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive.
For extradition, we understand the faculty that the government of the United States has to surrender a fugitive to other country or state because it has to face criminal charges.
With the Supreme Case of "Kentucky vs. Dennison" in 1860, the federal court did not have the authority to demand the return of a fugitive to another state. This changed in 1987 with the resolution of the case "Puerto Rico v. Brandstand," that overruled the "Kentucky vs. Dennison" case.
Answer:
Explanation:
You wouldn't have to ask the question if you lived in the United States during the Vietnam war. Nothing, no event since the civil war a century earlier, split the American people more than Vietnam.
Basically there were a number of things that it did.
1. Those fighting it were split about going over. Many college educated students would have enlisted immediately after Pearl Harbor in WWII. Those same class of people would not be persuaded that way during Vietnam
2. It gave rise to the civil rights movement. The colored didn't want to go to Vietnam, or not all of them. Those who were opposed, especially the colored, sympathized with organizations like the Black Panthers or the Peace movement headed by Martin Luther King.
3. It brought the war into American living rooms. I can still remember seeing the shooting of a Viet Cong prisoner. At the time, it was extremely graphic and if I may say so, very horrifying.
4. The white middle class was equally upset by Vietnam. There were rallies on the University campuses where the numbers were in the tens of thousands. My mother 79 at the time, insisted on going to one. She was not disappointed. The keynote speaker was Jane Fonda. The body count was just too high not to upset just about everyone.
5. Then there was Kent State. You would do well to look that up.
