They weren't so successful at conquering Europe or China. Of course, one can blame the long supply lines, but in these cases their adversaries were also determined to repulse them.
In contrast, Byzantium and Persia were exhausted from mutual warfare. Tribes related by kinship to Muslim Arabs had served as mercenaries during this period, so there was a lot of tactical knowledge available.
The Byzantines retreated to the highlands of Anatolia upon losing their lower-lying provinces to the Muslims. I am not sure if they launched a determined counter-attack. The Persians did, but they could not fight coherently.
The answer is A. Lower income potential
It cannot be be because it does not make sense earning money is a good thing not a bad thing on the job training would also not be the correct answer because although it would be a bit of a process it’s not as bad is going to college For training in fact it would actually make it easier end it is not the cost of tuition because you’d be working instead of going to college so you wouldn’t have a tuition
<span>Valentina Tereshkova
( </span>espère que cela a aidé)
It was stock market "speculation" that contributed the most to the Depression of 1920-21, since the value of many companies became incredibly inflated.
The most important effects that the Mongols had on Europe and Asia were increasing the flow of goods and knowledge between the two regions, the unification of present day Russia and the introduction of new diseases. For example, knowledge of gun-making traveled from Asia to Europe during Mongol rule<span> </span>
