Answer:
d. When people join a crowd, they lose their individuality and become part of something like a collective mind.
Explanation:
According to the <em>Classical Theory </em>of crowd behaviour the correct answer is <em>d. When people join a crowd, they lose their individuality and become part of something like a collective mind.</em><em> Classical Theory</em> states that the minds of those peoples integrating a crowd or group of people tend to "merge" their way of thinking into a single one. This way of social thinking fosters anonymity and may generate emotions. There are other valid theories such as <em>Contagion Theory, Convergence Theory </em>and <em> Group Mind Theory</em> among others.
Answer:
ooh reolli help me mark brainliest
Answer:
The scene is similar in that they both took Winnie Foster away from her safety zone, displacing her from her own comfortable place.
But then again, the situations are different as Mae had no evil intention behind her decision to take Winnie. But the man, on the other hand, had far more sinister ideas in mind behind the 'offer' to 'rescue' Winnie from the Tucks.
Explanation:
Natalie Babbitt's children novel <em>Tuck Everlasting</em> tells the story of how a family came to be immortal from their accidental drinking of water from a stream in the forest. And it is this 'immortality' that led to the disastrous event which led to the loss of a good friend Winnie.
When the<em> "man in the yellow suit"</em> took Winnie against her will to return her back to her family, Mae/ Mother Tuck took her husband's shotgun. She fired and killed the man, for she knows that the man wanted nothing but evil intentions. When asked why she did what she did, she replied that <em>"he was taking the child against against her will"</em> which is also exactly what she did.
These two situations of Winnie being taken away against her will are similar in that the two adults took advantage of her, without asking for her approval. Winnie had no choice but do what she is told to do so.
But for Mae, she had no evil intention except reveal the truth about her family's immortality and also provide a chance for her family to have an interaction with a real, living <em>"natural child"</em>. But the man had wanted to 'trade' on the water, trying to get it t more deserving people. That is how different the two situations are.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
In D, Jane feels bad about her action and conflicts with her FEELINGS about that action, meaning the conflict in this case would be internal or person vs. self specifically (the self being Jane's feelings).
Hope this helped somewhat! :P
