1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dimaraw [331]
3 years ago
15

Your textbook discusses research showing that people have better acuity for mental images that are visualized in the center of t

he retina, rather than in the periphery of the retina.
The reason that this research is significant is that:

a.it offers strong support for the propositional approach to mental images.

b.it demonstrates that the previous imagery research had been influenced by experimenter expectancy.

c.the research is similar to the results obtained when people perceive actual visual stimuli.

d.it demonstrates that individual differences in visual imagery are actually very small.
Social Studies
1 answer:
kirza4 [7]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

c.the research is similar to the results obtained when people perceive actual visual stimuli.

You might be interested in
What is the main problem in this story?<br> A Miller, His Son, and Their<br> Donkey-An Update
Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

A miller

Explanation:

I GUESS SOO

IAM REALLY WRONG

7 0
3 years ago
When a member is more concerned with achieving his or her own goals rather than meeting the needs of the group, which conflict s
Oxana [17]

Answer:

He or she is using a competition conflict style

Explanation:

In competition conflict style, individuals tend to put their own goal over the collective goal of the group and they advocate for their needs or rewards over those of others. it is the act of trying to establish superiority over individuals in the same group or team with you.

8 0
2 years ago
Do you think it is a good or bad idea for Quebec to become an independent nation? Explain. (Please use RACE when answering this
Serjik [45]

Answer:

Yes, Quebec should be a country.

Canada is a federation, meaning that its citizens have to pay taxes for both the federal (canadian) government and the provincial (quebec) government. This split makes it harder for the people of Quebec to strategically invest in its own industries. For example, Quebec has long ago nationalized hydroelectricity making the state a leader in green energy. When Quebecers decided to do so, the canadian government refused to invest even a single dollar in the project. Quebec’s prime minister at that time had to go see the americans to ask for a sufficient loan. What a shame it was to the canadian government going against such a nice project! Fast forward to now, Nova Scotia government (another province located next to Quebec being part of the canadian confederation) has the project to built all the infrastructure to export hydroelectricity to the US… and guess what? Canadian Government is totally in favor of the idea and willing to fund the project with fresh capital, part of that capital coming from taxes paid by Quebecers. So Quebec taxes will help fund a competitor since Quebec is already exporting a lot of energy to their US partners while it had absolutely no help when they built their own hydroelectricity project.

This example is just one of the many examples that Quebecers have had to endure over the past decades. When the financial crisis happened in 08-09, Ontario’s auto industry have been bailed out for more than $10 Billion from the Canadian Government (again, part of this money - roughly 20% - came from Quebec’s taxes paid to the federal government). At that same time, Quebec was struggling with its paper/pulp industry and the federal government injected less than 100M$ in the industry to help it. Now Bombardier, one of the great engeneering business of Quebec is struggling, and guess what? Quebec has to inject all of the money to help them since canadian government won't do a single thing.

A lot of the people in Quebec stand against the building of pipelines that would allow dirty oil sands to cross the eastern part of the country for international exportation. Canadians want Quebec to accept the pipeline since it would help the western part of the country to export/sell its dirty oil internationally. As a province, Quebec doesn’t have any legal capacity to oppose to such project while this goes a lot against their willingness. If Quebec was a country, it could oppose to such thing and participate to a greater extend to a cleaner planet. Quebecers have all the capacity and knowledge to invest massively in clean energy and stop using oil for transport over a short timeframe. The only things that is keeping them away is the fact that it does not have control over all its revenues while the federal government have a totally different gameplan.

Being a country would allow Quebecers to gain 100% control over their taxes and would leave them with more money to do good things for the whole planet. We would be leaders in clean energy instead of subsidizing the dirty oilsands in the western part of the country. Our army would be one of peace keeping and territory protection and our peace keeping message would be heard amongst UN and UNESCO. We would be a much better leader amongst nations willing the reduce greenhouse gas instead of financing oil sands. Our engineering firms like Hydro-Quebec would be venturing project like electrification of transport.

Not only Quebec should be a country but people all around the world should support them in their quest for the building of a great new country.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What types of plants grown in saudi arabia​
Alexxandr [17]

Explanation:

Major crops include cereals (wheat, sorghum, barley and millet), vegetables (tomato, watermelon, eggplant, potato, cucumber and onions), fruits (date-palm, citrus and grapes) and forage crops (alfalfa).

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What animal did the explorers discover that they first described as a barking squirrel?
sveta [45]

Answer:

The correct answer is a black-tailed prairie dog.

Explanation:

Lewis and Clark made their first reports of the flora and fauna they discovered along the Missouri River between 1804 and 1806. They also documented their observations of the Rocky Mountains and the Pacific Northwest. Lewis and Clark gave descriptions of at least 178 plants and 122 animals. Among these was the black-tailed prairie dog which the explorers described as a "barking squirrel." The explorers sent this specimen to President Jefferson to show some concrete evidence of their discoveries.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Aztecs apply their engineering skills to the challenges of living on an island?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement best defines a communist government?
    13·2 answers
  • Bev lives in the suburbs and works downtown. She drives to work, and her most direct route to work would require her to pass thr
    15·1 answer
  • What barriers prevented plants, animals, and people from reaching North America?
    5·1 answer
  • Why is power sharing desirable?
    15·1 answer
  • An issue that generates substantial benefits to a small group of individuals while imposing a small cost on many others is calle
    15·2 answers
  • Diego wants to surprise Louisa, whom he has only been dating for a month, with a gift. He decides to ask Louisa’s sister what he
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT an example of nonmaterial culture?
    15·1 answer
  • If you experience a blowout in one of your front tires, your vehicle will __________.
    10·1 answer
  • Although __________ is able to make someone feel better about being angry, it does not seem to make the anger go away. A. Adapta
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!