I would say b mutual funds
<em>Hi there! I'd be happy to answer, please correct me if this is wrong :)</em>
Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole
<em></em>
<em>Hope this helps! ^v^</em>
Answer:
A. Hinduism losing favor in India
Explanation:
The Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent started as early as the 8th century, though at that time they were very limited on only small areas on the fringes of the region. As the time was passing, the small sultanates managed to gain more and more followers which abandoned the Hinduism and accepted the Islam. This gave them much more power, so gradually the Muslim conquests were expanding throughout India, with multiple smaller sultanates being created. The major Muslim conquest though came with the invasion of the Mughals. They were a very powerful force, and managed to get under their control big portion of India, heavily influencing parts of the region and converting lot of people to Islam on the expense of the Hinduism.
Answer:
Its probably A
Explanation:
I don't really think that any of those arguments are actually good. However, answer B is wrong because political parties won't necessarily lose financial support if somebody votes against them. it also doesn't really fit as an argument to why you should vote even though the other party will probably win. Number C is not logical because you don't just strt parties because the party you support loses. That way all the existing parties will lose votes and not only the ones you are against. Answer D is just a very bad argument. Think about, would you change where you proably live all your life just because they have more influence on the vote? What about your job, friends and family. And if they mean for you to fly or ride to another state just to vote and then come back, that bad too because it's expensive.