1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Flura [38]
3 years ago
6

What would be a problem with having only state court systems?

History
1 answer:
olga_2 [115]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

well it sounds like it could work in a big picture, but getting into it having an only state court system would give the states too much power, they would have full control and be able to do anything they want.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Is this statement true or false?
Aleks04 [339]

Answer:

the first one Congress passed the Slavery Act, which allowed blacks to own slaves in an attempt to give blacks the rights of full citizenship. is false

the second one Ratifying the 14th amendment guaranteeing individual rights, was one way the government attempted to give blacks the right of full citizenship. is ture

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The prevalence of _____ thinking encouraged slavery to develop in the South. A. Puritan<br> B. industrial<br> C. aristocratic<br
IRINA_888 [86]
<span>The prevalence of industrial thinking encouraged slavery to develop in the South.the South found it difficult to develop a manufacturing industry instead, it depended on imports from the North And according to Eric Williams, although slavery stifled Caribbean economic growth, it encouraged global commodity circulation a major precondition for the British industrialization.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer. If a payment is directly deducted from your account, which type of card are you using? A. credit card
Citrus2011 [14]
Debit card etjyeutrjwtjwthraghwrg
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One theme of United States History is the tension between individual state governments and the national government. Trace the hi
Andrew [12]

This tension within the government of the United States can be traced back to the creation of the nation. At the beginning of its history, the United States was a collection of colonies, all of which were considered independent of each other. However, as the colonies gained independence, they decided to join in order to be stronger and ensure more protection. This led to a loose Confederation, which was the first instance of a United States.

An example of this was the writing of the Articles of Confederation. These articles were written by delegates from each of the colonies that had recently gained independence. The Articles are considered the first Constitution of the US, and they gave the federal government very little power, allowing states to have most of it. The passage of the Constitution reverted this to some extent, giving slightly more power to the federal government.

Another example of this tension occurred in the early 19th century. During this time period, each state was able to decide whether they would allow slavery within their borders, without much interference from the federal government. With the passage of the Missouri Compromise in 1820, half of the states of the country were slave states, while the other half were free states. This tension led to the Civil War.

Finally, prior to the Civil Rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s, segregation and Jim Crow laws were common in many states of the South. Many of these states refused to accept the authority of the federal government when these practices were outlawed.

The founders of the nation most likely made this possible for two reasons. First, they wanted to allow the original colonies to retain some of their original sovereignty. Second, they wanted to prevent the federal government from having too much power, as they believed that this could lead to a second monarchy or a dictatorship.

8 0
3 years ago
08/20-21/20- The Jungle
Nezavi [6.7K]

Answer:

1. Yes

2. Yes

Explanation:

Third-person narration gives credibility to the narrator. This is because third-person narrations provide a complete overview of all the factors that make up the story, which are told in an impartial way. With that, we know that the narrator is not shaping the story at his pleasure, but explaining the facts in an omnipresent and coherent way within the story. It all provides trust and credibility.

However, although first-person narrators, even though they are less reliable, they manage to make the reader feel strong empathy. This is because the first-person narrator is able to explain his feelings and emotions in a profound way, since he knows them intensely, even if he is not narrating true facts.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is an equation for the linear function whose graph contains the points (−1, −2) and (3, 10) ? Enter your answers in the box
    5·2 answers
  • What was the main religion of the Persian Empire?
    5·2 answers
  • Why did kristallnacht took place
    9·1 answer
  • Put these events in the order in which they occurred
    7·1 answer
  • Who was Mary Todd Lincoln? and why was she disliked?​
    6·1 answer
  • How has the definition of genocide changed over time
    13·1 answer
  • Why was Brian traveling in a bushplane?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement most accurately describes the Neolithic agricultural revolution? Nomadic tribes began to trap animals for food a
    12·1 answer
  • HURRY PLS AM TIMED I’LL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    15·2 answers
  • Which civilization was established first?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!