Answer:
C. applied unequally across states.
Explanation:
The case of Furman V. Georgia occured in 1972. At that time, most states did not necessarily 'Banned' the use of death penalty as a punishment. But the problems occurred because it seems that each states have different standard when determining which type of criminals should be sentenced with death penalty.
Example of the unequal application :
Furman was sentenced to death penalty because he killed someone during an attempted robbery. But criminals who convicted with the same charge in California at that time was punished with 25 years of prison time. Not death penalty.
Answer:
Operant Conditioning
Explanation:
Operant Conditioning -
It is one of the learning method , which occurs by some punishments and rewards for a particular task or behavior , is referred to as operant conditioning.
As, from the scenario of the question,
Millie opted to get groceries from online platform , rather than offline , as it wait a lot of her time , while purchasing groceries from the supermarket.
Therefore ,
Millie demonstrates , operant conditioning.
Answer: The correct answer is: II. Secrete Ballots
III. Split ticket voting
Explanation: In 1896 progressives achieved that in almost all states a secret ballot was implemented. This type of secret voting was announced by the state, all candidates and all parties were listed. Through this system people could divide their ticket when voting and they were no longer required to vote for the party line.
I think the question here asks for Canada and US: those two countries are know to be popular immigrant choices.
Also, while Greenland is part of Northern America, it has been closer associated with Europe, and it's rarely actually called a "northern American country"
Answer:
The correct answer is : False
Explanation:
It is false because the participants would be able to evaluate each other’s assertions. They would be motivated by the desire of getting a rational consensus. The doctrine is based on the fact that everyone can question any assertion. It also says that every person with the ability to speak and act is permitted to be and take part in a discourse.
