Answer:
mid-7th century to the mid-13th century
Explanation:
I would argue that the scientific method wasn't very revolutionary during the scientific revolution seeing as it existed for hundreds of years. i think it was one of the ancient Greek or roman philosophers that first developed a series of thought that closely resembles the scientific method we know today. however another interpretation of the question is in the definition of revolution. the scientific revolution wasn't bloody like the British/french/american revolution. however the " dictionary definition" of revolution is completing an orbit. in that sense you could consider the scientific revolution a misnomer. in conclusion i think that the ways in which the scientific revolution differed from other revolts are numerous.
Answer:The main purpose of Patrick Henry 's speech at Virginia Conference, was to convince the delegates to secede from Britain; moreover, to fight back against them. He antagonizes Britain by imputing every hardships they faced to Britain.
Explanation:
Wilson wanted to created lasting peace across nations, so aimed for the creation of the League of Nations(later known as UN). The United States never joined it, and many people didn't want the country getting involved in foreign affairs
There are no options given, but historically speaking it was the invention of "Cotton Gin".
A cotton gin was a revolutionary invention which enabled people to
easily separate cotton fibers and seeds; previously it used to take a large
time sorting it manually. The inventor behind this was <span>Eli Whitney. The processing was made easy but
still slaves were needed to grow cotton.</span>
