<span>Personal selling, as a form promotion, differs when the effort is a B2B (business to business) sales effort rather than a B2C (business to consumer) sales effort. B2B personal selling requires more prospecting and qualifying of customers. When you are selling to a business, you need to make sure your product is the best qualified for the business you are selling to, to use to sell to their customers. The process is a lot harder because many manufactures are competing to contract out with another company to provide them with a product they can use to make their final product they sell to consumers. </span>
Answer:
Et cetera is ur answer for this question
Answer: $1,900 less than under absorption costing.
Explanation:
The ending inventory of finished goods under variable costing is the difference in carrying value of ending finished goods inventory.
That is calculated as,
Difference in Carrying Value of Ending Finished Goods Inventory = Unit fixed Manufacturing Overhead * Change in Inventory in Units
The Unit Fixed Manufacturing Overhead as implied is the fixed Manufacturing Overhead per unit
Calculated therefore as,
Unit fixed manufacturing overhead = 129,010 / 6,790
= $19
Now that we have that, we can refer back to thw first formula,
Difference in carrying value of ending finished goods inventory = Unit fixed manufacturing overhead * Change in inventory in units
= 19 × (6,790 - 6,690)
= $1,900
The carrying value on the balance sheet of the ending inventory of finished goods under variable costing would be $1,900 less than under absorption costing.
Answer:
D. $210 million
Explanation:
Data given
Decrease in deferred tax assets = $30
Increase in deferred tax liabilities = $60
Taxable income = $300
Tax rate = 40%
The computation of total income tax expense is given below:-
Income tax Payable = $300 × 40%
= $120
Total income tax expenses = Income tax Payable + Decrease in deferred tax assets + Increase in deferred tax liabilities
= $120 + $30 million + $60 million
= $210 million
So, for computing the total income tax expense we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
3.72 years
Explanation:
The cash payback period of this investment is the initial investment of $142,104 divided by net increase in cash in cash flow per period.
Cash Payback Period = Initial Investment
/Net increase Cash Flow per Period
Net increase in cash flow per period=$80,000-$41,800=$38,200
Cash payback period=$142,104/$38,200=3.72 years
It would take 3 years 9 months(0.72*12 months) for the project to pay back its initial investment of $142,104