McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
The essay of Barbara Holland speaks in favor of having one child so that parents can have more peace, time for themselves, and control over the child. Many children can have various demands, they develop separately, and this can rob parents of their time, privacy, and comfort. When there is one child, parents outnumber the child and can dedicate themselves more to personal self-development.
Explanation:
<u>Barbara Holland claims that when there is more than one child in the family they instantly outnumber the parents, and therefore can’t be under good control, discipline, and taught manners. </u>There are more problems and obligations that parents have to handle.
Parents can never be comfortable nor provide time for themselves. They are <u>robbed of privac</u>y, time for conversation, and their marriage can be affected by this. <u>Parents won’t have the privilege to develop themselves as individuals. </u>
Holland claims <u>every child will develop it’s “own culture” </u>and want separate things and have individual demands. <u>They become “counterculture” in the family, in contrast to parents</u>. Parents have to satisfy their demands and accept their conditions, instead of otherwise.
I'm no angrier about this than anyone else.
Because of the word 'no' , it cannot be the other answers.
Answer:
3
Explanation:
1. treat in a way that is apparently kind or helpful but that betrays a feeling of superiority.
2.
frequent (a store, theater, restaurant, or other establishment) as a customer.
(D) King deliberately cut short the second attempt to avoid additional violence.<span>^2</span>
