Narrowing your topic. The last one
Answer:
among many who have been killed because Stand Your Ground law.
Explanation:
In the article "Jordan Davis's Mother: Don't Use My Son's Death to Expand Stand Your Ground" author Lucy McBath describes how people try to get away with law bill because Lucy McBath's son is among many who have been killed because of Stand Your Ground law.
McBath develops the fact that her son's killer spending life time in prison through the provision of Stand Your Ground law is not how justice should be served.
Stating, "Don't you dare use my son's name to justify your support for this reckless bill." This shows that the bill is not to be used as an example of securing justice because the criminal does not really get acquitted with the right punishment.
Furthermore, the author states, "Stand Your Ground laws make all of us more vulnerable to the threat of gun violence, but they also have a disproportionate impact on communities of color."
This evidence develops the central idea because many people use this law as a defence card after they are charged with murder or violence.
In the end, it is all about a mother losing a child to a reckless law which could've been avoided if lawmakers understood the grief of gun violence.
The characters in the Hunger Games that rebelled against the government were being killed for what they were doing and very few people wanted to side with them because they knew it was against the law. The characters stuck to the plan, though. They rebelled and disobeyed and fought the authorities. In the end, they won and were able to defeat the bad government in order to progress into a better country. Rebellion comes a great cost. Hundreds of people died on both sides in order for the bad situation to be made better. The country became great and a happy, equal place because a single group had the courage to break the law in hope for a better life.
People need to question their authorities because they aren’t always right. If people let government, authorities, or any leader have total say and control then it becomes a dictatorship. People question the laws and the authority and it makes people reconsider what they have always known to be true. If someone can hear another side, they can consider that side and maybe change their mind. There are two sides to every story and sometimes it only takes the acknowledgement of the other side for people to see the wrongness of the current system. Once the other side is recognized, two sides can talk about it and come to a better, middle-road decision. If the government refuses to come to a compromise or is unwilling to listen, people have every right to fight. Even in the Bible, Christians are given the ability and responsibility to revolt against a government that goes against God’s will. It’s the responsibility of the people to make sure we are doing God’s will and pleasing Him in the world. For the good of society, people have to stand up for what they believe is right so that others can chose what they believe and, if they are inclined, they can fight, too. It’s up to the people to fight for what’s right and, in doing so, promote a better place to live in. So i see rebellion as a useful trait in this situations.
Answer and Explanation:
The author could give the date on which the war began and the date on which the ceasefire was determined. In addition, the author could present the dates that the meetings between the two countries were determined and the terms discussed. This would allow the reader to answer questions about whether this war is recent and what the problems were between the two countries.
Furthermore, the author could present the social and economic problems that the citizens of Utopia are going through. This would allow the reader to answer the question about what the citizens' claims are.
Answer:
I believe the sentence that would most likely be found in a body paragraph is:
B. According to Ogden's longtime animal control officer, Jack Strop, there have been "no less than a dozen zoo escapes from Ogden Park in the last year, the most in the country by far."
Explanation:
To understand this question, we need first to clarify what a body paragraph is. When writing an essay, we will have an introduction, a couple of body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
In the introduction, the author begins to delineate what the essay will be about. He also states what his opinion is. Notice that options C and D do precisely that. Option D uses a little story to introduce the topic, option C states the author's opinion.
In the conclusion, we restate the opinion expressed in the introduction. That is what option A does.
<u>Therefore, option B is the one left for a body paragraph. This type of paragraph is used to develop the author's opinion. In it, the author will provide evidence that supports his ideas. That is what option B does. The information given by the animal control officer is evidence that supports the author's opinion that the zoo must be closed.</u>
