What has the greatest potential to demotivate you and lead you to unproductive activities

James has a marginal tax rate of 24%. He suddenly realizes that he neglected to include a $7,000 tax deduction. How will this ov

Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

hmhgdmthde

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Precision Construction entered into the following transactions during a recent year.

shusha [124]

Answer:

Jan-02

Dr Bulldozer $ 250,000

Cr Cash $ 20,000

Cr Note Payable $ 230,000

Jan-03

Dr Bulldozer $ 20,000

Cr Accounts Payable $ 20,000

Jan-30

Dr Accounts Payable $ 20,000

Cr Cash $ 20,000

Feb-01

Dr Repair and Maintenance Expense $ 800

Cr Cash $ 800

Mar-01

Dr Computer Software $ 3,600

Cr Cash $ 3,600

Explanation:

Preparation of the journal entries for each of the above transactions.

Jan-02

Dr Bulldozer $ 250,000

Cr Cash $ 20,000

Cr Note Payable $ 230,000

(Purchased bulldozer)

Jan-03

Dr Bulldozer $ 20,000

Cr Accounts Payable $ 20,000

(Replaced tracks on bulldozer)

Jan-30

Dr Accounts Payable $ 20,000

Cr Cash $ 20,000

(Paid cash)

Feb-01

Dr Repair and Maintenance Expense $ 800

Cr Cash $ 800

(Repaired seat of bulldozer)

Mar-01

Dr Computer Software $ 3,600

Cr Cash $ 3,600

(Purchase computer software)

8 0

3 years ago

In the United States, the money supply is determined: A) only by the Fed. B) only by the behavior of individuals who hold money

Thepotemich [5.8K]

Answer: Joint by the FED and by the behavior of individuals who hold money and of banks which money is held.

Explanation: The Federal Reserve System, often referred as the Federal reserve or simply "the fed", is the central bank of the united states. It was created by the congress to provide the nation with a safer, more flexible, and more stable monetary and financial system. The FED was created on December 23, 1913, when president Woodrow Wilson signed the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT into law. The Fed and the behavior of individuals not only define how much money are available, they can also define macroeconomic indicators like inflation.

8 0

3 years ago

You are a self-employed profit-maximizing consultant specializing in monoplies. Five single-price, profit-maximizing monopolies

inna [77]

Answer:

Firm A

Firm A is charging a cost of $3.90 for every unit. The normal expense is the all out cost separated by amount which ends up being $3.70 per unit. Presently its minor income is $3.00 per unit and negligible expense is $2.90 per unit. The imposing business model firm can't create enough yield in light of the fact that the minor income surpasses the minimal expense.

Consequently, Firm A is encouraged to expand its yield. This will bring increasingly net income and get it a higher benefit. The yield should increment till minimal income and negligible expense gets equivalent.

Firm B

Firm B is charging a cost of $5.90 for every unit. The normal expense is $4.74 per unit. Presently its peripheral expense is $5.90 per unit. Note that the syndication firm is charging a value which is equivalent to the negligible expense. Consequently, it is carrying on seriously. by delivering more and charging less.

Consequently, Firm An is encouraged to diminish its yield. This will expand cost more than the expansion in cost with the goal that it acquires a higher benefit. The yield should diminish till minimal income and minor expense gets equivalent.

Firm C

Firm C is charging a cost of $11.00 for every unit. The normal expense is the all out expense is $11.90 per unit. Minimal income is $9.00 per unit and minor expense is $9.00 per unit. The imposing business model firm is delivering a benefit expanding yield on the grounds that the minor income rises to the peripheral expense. Nonetheless, it is bearing misfortunes since normal expense is higher than cost.

Thus, Firm C is encouraged to stay at the present degree of yield. It can close down over the long haul if misfortunes keep on happening. This is on the grounds that it can't increment or diminishing its yield as it will just alumni the misfortunes.

Firm D

Firm D is charging a cost of $35.90 for every unit. The normal expense is additionally 35.90 per unit. The minor income is $37.90 per unit and negligible expense is $37.90 per unit. The imposing business model firm is creating a benefit amplifying yield on the grounds that the minor income approaches the peripheral expense. Strangely, its cost is not as much as its negligible income which is beyond the realm of imagination.

Thus, Firm D has fouled up estimations with respect to its cost. Thoughtfully, the cost ought to consistently be higher than the minimal income or at most extreme it tends to be equivalent to minor income. It ought to return and recalculate the cost.

Firm E

The information identified with the minor income and minimal expense for Firm E isn't given. The cost charged is $35.00 per unit. The normal expense is at its base level and is equivalent to $33.00 per unit. This data isn't adequate to distinguish if the firm is working at a benefit boosting level.

Therefore, Firm E is encouraged to stay at the present degree of yield.

6 0

3 years ago

A company is selling bonds with a face value of $1,000 to raise money for a plant expansion. The bonds pay a coupon rate of 4% p

Ksivusya [100]

Answer:

10.26%

Explanation:

According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-

Net sales = $760

Face value of bonds = $1,000

Coupon rate = 4% = $1,000 × 4 ÷ 100

= 40

N = Number of Years = 5 annually = semiannually = 5 × 2

= 10 years

We assume, interest rate = 10% = 0.10

P = Coupon Rate ÷ 2 × (PVIFA,Interest Rate ÷ 2%,No. of Years) + Future Value(PVIF,Interest Rate ÷ 2%, No. of Years)

=$40 ÷ 2 × [1 - 1 ÷ (1 + Interest Rate)N] ÷ Interest Rate + Future Value[1 ÷ (1 + Interest Rate) × N]

=$40 ÷ 2 × [1-1 ÷ (1 + 0.10 ÷ 2)^10] ÷ 0.05 + $1,000 × [1 ÷ (1 + 0.10 ÷ 2)^10]

=$20 × [1 - 1 ÷ (1.05)^10] ÷ 0.05 + $1,000 × [1 ÷ (1.05)^10]

=$20 × [1 -1 ÷ 1.6288946] ÷ 0.05 + $1,000 × [1 ÷ 1.6288946]

= 420 × 7.72173 + $1,000 × 0.613913

= $154.4346 + $613.913

= $768.3476

= $768.35

But the given value is 760, so we assume interest rate = 11%

=$40 ÷ 2 × [1-1 ÷ (1 + Interest Rate)^N] ÷ Interest Rate + Future Value[1 ÷ (1 + Interest Rate)^N]

= $40 ÷ 2 × [1 - 1 ÷(1 + 0.11 ÷ 2)^10] ÷ 0.055 + $1,000 × [1 ÷ (1 + 0.11 ÷ 2)^10]

= $20 × [1 - 1 ÷ (1.055)^10] ÷ 0.055 + $1,000 × [1 ÷ (1.055)^10]

= $20 × [1 - 1 ÷ 1.70814446] ÷ 0.055 + $1000 × [1 ÷ 1.70814446]

= $20 × 7.5376255 + $1,000 × 0.5854306

= $150.75 + $585.43

= $736.18

At the Interest rate of 10% the price is more than $760 and at the Interest rate of 1% the price is less than $760. So the required rate lies in between 10% to 11%.

So required rate

Yield To Maturity = Lower Interest Rate + (Difference Between Interest Rate) × Higher Price - Received Price ÷ Higher Price - Lower Price

= 1 0+( 11 - 10) × $768.35 - $760 ÷ $768.35 - $736.18

= 10 + 1 × $8.35 ÷ $32.17

= 10 + 0.26

= 10.26%

7 0

3 years ago