Socrates’ analysis of the hatred he has incurred is one part of a larger theme that he dwells on throughout his speech. Athens is a democracy, a city in which the many are the dominant power in politics, and it can therefore be expected to have all the vices of the many. Because most people hate to be tested in argument, they will always take action of some sort against those who provoke them with questions. But that is not the only accusation Socrates brings forward against his city and its politics. He tells his democratic audience that he was right to have withdrawn from political life, because a good person who fights forjustice in a democracy will be killed. In his cross-examination of Meletus, he insists that only a few people can acquire the knowledge necessary for improving the young of any species, and that the many will inevitably do a poor job. He criticizes the Assembly for its illegal actions and the Athenian courts for the ease with which matters of justice are distorted by emotional pleading. Socrates implies that the very nature of democracy makes it a corrupt political system. Bitter experience has taught him that most people rest content with a superficial understanding of the most urgent human questions. When they are given great power, their shallowness inevitably leads to injustice.
<span>The Charge Of Impiety</span>
Answer:
C. Allowing for more freedom of speech
Explanation:
<em>The Soviet economy has experienced major issues in the 1980s. Years of central power had resulted in stagnation, and the Soviet economy was already struggling to cope with President Ronald Reagan's military expansion in the United States. In response, during the Twenty-Seventh Party Congress in 1986, Gorbachev proposed two proposals which is the first for "perestroika," or total economic transformation, and the second for "glasnost," or transparency. The earlier approach would prepare the way for the privatization of farming and industry, the development of profit incentives, and the establishment of a market system for fixing prices and managing internal commerce. Glasnost would loosen censor regulations and introduce new civil freedoms. Although the recommendations were well embraced by Soviet residents, the Party leadership remained wary of change.</em>
