Judicial activism is the act of passing ruling in a court not according to the law, but to personal beliefs and preferences. The opposite of judicial activism is judicial restraint, in which the judges follow the constitution exactly and abstain from passing ruling not specified in the constitution.
Predators of frogs would need to hunt other food sources, leading to decreases in both the predators and the new prey. The prey of frog would run rampant as one of their predators are now gone.
Answer:
It is a right so yes, unless they are mentally ill such as a pyschopath
Explanation: