As the industrial revolution came to the united states, most firms operated in a production orientation. The United States' transition to new industrial techniques between around 1760 and some time between 1820 and 1840 is known as the Industrial Revolution.
This transition encompassed the switch from manual to mechanical production methods, the invention of new ways for producing chemicals and iron, the expansion of steam and water power, the creation of machine tools, and the growth of the mechanized factory system. As a result of the significant increase in output, both the population and the pace of population growth saw previously unheard-of increases during industrial revolution.
To learn more about industrial revolution, click here
brainly.com/question/455063
#SPJ4
Answer:
Stock Y has overvalued and Stock Z as undervalued
Explanation:
In this question, we apply the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) formula which is shown below
Expected rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return)
For Stock Y
= 4.85% + 1.40 × 7.35%
= 4.85% + 10.29%
= 15.14%
For Stock Z
= 4.85% + 0.85 × 7.35%
= 4.85% + 6.2475%
= 11.0975%
The (Market rate of return - Risk-free rate of return) is also called market risk premium and the same is applied in the answer
As we see the expected return of both the stock So, Stock Y has overvalued and Stock Z as undervalued
Answer:
2030
Explanation:
The computation of the total number of new generators including this year is shown below
Given that
(A) = 100
Common Ratio (r) = 1.15
n = 10
Now
Sum of 10 terms Sn is
= A × (r n - 1) ÷ (r - 1)
= 100 × (1.1510 - 1) ÷ (1.15 - 1)
= 100 × 3.0456 ÷ 0.15
= 2030
We simply applied the above formula so that the total number of new generators could come
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there is no further information about the case of study, we can say that the question possible refers to the case where the name of the company is just "The Client." The name of the document is "Leading Innovation Change - The Kotter Way."
This case refers to the challenges faced by an organization when it is time to innovate. Many members want to innovate but the culture of the company or the lack of proper leadership from managers often hinders the innovation efforts of the company.
So some of the elements of Kotter's Eight Stages of Leading Change that were included in the case were the following.
Create Urgency. The creation of new products of the company was limited and was not enough to compete in the future. A sense of urgency was needed to implement innovation.
Form a Powerful coalition. The company had to be very selective about the kinds of products that could help it to successfully compete in the future. The company had to use the best it had to establish priorities.
Create a vision for change. It was critical for the company to establish a new vision to get the results it needed. A renovation of the processes to face new necessities was imperative. Change has to be part of every member's mind.
Communicate the vision. This new vision had to be shared through the entire company. The members had to understand the importance of the innovative practices and each and every one of them had to be part of this new mentality.
Most likely the first one. That's what I would put .. hope this helped :)
