COMPLETE QUESTION:
A psycholinguist conducts an experiment with a group of participants from a small village in Asia and another from a small village in South America. She asked the groups to describe the bands of color they saw in a rainbow and found they reported the same number of bands as their language possessed primary color words. These results:
Group of answer choices
(a) support the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
(b) contradict the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
(c) support the word frequency effect
(d) contradict the word frequency effect
ANSWER: SUPPORT THE SAPIR-WHORF HYPOTHESIS.
EXPLANATION:
SAPIR-WHORF HYPOTHESIS is also referred to as the “linguistic determinism hypothesis”.
The hypothesis stated that language and it's structure directly influence or limit the knowledge and thinking capacities of it speakers.
Thus, the experiments underwent by the psycholinguist support SAPIR-WHORF HYPOTHESIS, since the two group of participants described the same bands of color seen in the rainbow, because their language incorporate the primary color words.
Answer: It not only made day to day life easier and more efficent, but inspired new advancements which changed the way they thought and worked.
Explanation:
Answer: b. dialectical thinking.
Explanation:
Dialectical thinking is a way of reasoning in which the person thinks and synthesis the two opposing viewpoints on the same situation, topic or object. The dialectical thinking is a feature of one's cognitive ability.
The dialectical thinking is supported by the new experiences and interpersonal interaction with the daily life situations.
According to the given situation, here, Aldrich is showing a change in opinion about the same topic. This is the outcome of the dialectical thinking which has been generated due to comparison between previously known facts that honesty is a best policy but honesty is not always beneficial for the person thus has created two opposing view points. This is the outcome of development of the cognitive flexibility.
Answer:
What factors make intersections particularly dangerous?
This is part of the road where multiple paths intersect and drivers usually misjudge most situations associated with these paths and how they should proceed .
How can drivers actions reduce the dangers of intersection?
They need to follow every single road or driving procedures associated with intersections for example if a vehicle on your left reaches the intersection after you , you should continue driving but if it arrives first you must make sure that you yield .
When two vehicles arrives at the intersection simultaneously from different roads especially in an uncontrolled intersection where there are no stop signs or any road signs the one on the right has a right of way and the driver on the left need to yield .
Whether it is uncontrolled or controlled intersection drivers need to approach them with caution and not assume that the other drive will do that on their behalf .
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The process of learning involves perception, the way we perceive things from the environment or in school. Then it comes to process the information, which means the wat we think about what we are observing. We reflect on it and conceptualize to better understand. Then, we have to put into action what we learn in order to totally understand it. To master what we learn, we have to practice it once or twice until we get it.
